2026-01-06 21:25:27

Most of the positions have already been replenished.

BTC spot binary structure—if bullish, I expect the price won't fall much further.

Interestingly, yesterday when the funding rate hit the bottom, the price peaked. So today, when the price hits the bottom, will the funding rate also peak? This inverse relationship is indeed worth observing. The attached chart shows detailed data.

BTC-0,43%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TradingNightmare

· 01-06 23:33

The logic that the fee rate has peaked is a bit absolute, and the reverse nested doll is truly hard to see through.

View OriginalReply0

PaperHandsCriminal

· 01-06 21:54

I'm also pondering this inverse relationship, just worried I might interpret it backwards again haha

View OriginalReply0

DegenTherapist

· 01-06 21:51

The term "spot binary" sounds a bit too simplified, but observing the inverse relationship is quite interesting. Funding rates and prices are inversely... Is that true? Adding positions this time is a bit intense haha

View OriginalReply0

SelfStaking

· 01-06 21:51

Fee rates hit the bottom while prices peak; this reverse logic is indeed tricky, gotta keep a close watch.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCryBaby

· 01-06 21:46

Funding rate and price are moving in opposite directions? Bro, this observation is pretty interesting, but I'm more concerned about whether your recent replenishment can withstand the next round of sell-off.

View OriginalReply0

CoinBasedThinking

· 01-06 21:40

The inverse relationship between funding rates and prices is indeed intriguing; we need to keep a close eye on this data wave.

View OriginalReply0

LeekCutter

· 01-06 21:33

Funding rate reversal indeed has tricks; you need to keep a close watch.

View OriginalReply0