A few days ago, ASTER experienced a wave of correction around $0.81, which triggered different opinions in the market. On one side were those who cut losses in time, and on the other side were spectators complaining about the situation. To be honest, scenes like this happen periodically in the market, but a calm analysis often reveals that it is precisely the moment institutions are accumulating.
First, let's talk about the essence of this correction. Many participants initially entered ASTER for two main reasons: either they were attracted by the community hype or they followed the direction of influential figures. Once a 10% pullback occurs, their psychological expectations are shattered. Even if this small loss could be easily recovered in other assets, they still choose to cut their losses. This emotion-driven trading approach is fundamentally inefficient.
My reason for being bullish at this level is actually quite straightforward. The first is the destruction mechanism. Public data shows that the project team has already reduced the circulating supply from 8 billion to 7.922 billion. Some might think that a few tens of millions in burns is insignificant. But in crypto projects, the most important aspect of burns is attitude and sustainability. This move clearly demonstrates the project's commitment to deflation, which is not just marketing hype but a real effort to change the tokenomics.
During periods of market sentiment volatility, projects with solid fundamentals that are being sold off often accumulate the highest quality chips. ASTER's burn cycle is still ongoing, and at this pace, there is room for further imagination. Instead of following the emotional impulse to cut losses, it's better to understand the project's long-term logic.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NestedFox
· 11h ago
Is it the same old story again? Can the destruction mechanism really save the market?
People who cut losses should regret it. Just wait a bit longer.
Influencers set the tone, retail investors take the hit, cycle repeats.
The 0.81 level is indeed a bit aggressive, but I still don't trust it.
The reduction in circulating supply looks like a positive, but how much of it can actually be realized?
Wait until the hype dies down. It's exhausting to get in now.
View OriginalReply0
Anon32942
· 01-08 01:00
Those who cut losses are all scared out; this time, 0.81 is a low-level accumulation.
The project team is really continuously burning tokens, not just talking about it.
Let's wait and see the subsequent performance; the long-term logic is there.
This wave of correction is just the right opportunity to get in; don't be driven by emotions.
The burning mechanism is indeed a highlight; it depends on the project's execution.
People who follow the trend and cut losses will regret it in hindsight—typical inefficient trading.
I like ASTER's attitude; the economic model is being optimized.
0.81 is really near the bottom, just wait and see.
Institutions are quietly accumulating; retail investors are still cutting each other, old tricks.
Look at the long term, not the short term; the burning cycle isn't over yet.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTinfoilHat
· 01-06 21:51
People who cut losses really have no psychological preparation at all, still shouting it's over at 0.81? Destroying this part is indeed a bit meaningful.
The market is like this; all the shakeouts are just to create bagholders. Institutions are accumulating, and you're still shouting about a decline.
Confident in the upcoming rhythm, the deflationary execution is right here.
It's not the first time; someone always cries each time.
This position is actually quite attractive; it all depends on who can stay calm.
View OriginalReply0
AlgoAlchemist
· 01-06 21:51
Honestly, people who cut losses just don't understand the destruction mechanism.
Cutting losses is easy, making money is hard, brother.
Being knocked down to 0.81, this account is a bit亏.
The project team is really promoting destruction, not just empty slogans.
Every adjustment repeats the same play, it's numbingly predictable.
Those who don't hold a long-term logic are doomed to be收割.
Destruction has gone from 8 billion to 7.922 billion, it doesn't look like much but it affects the attitude score.
Following big V's cuts is not as good as researching the fundamentals yourself.
Emotional trading is just giving institutions chips, have you awakened yet?
View OriginalReply0
GasWaster
· 01-06 21:51
0.81 wave, I'm still observing. Those who cut losses are the ones scared out.
The destruction has been reduced from 8 billion to 7.922 billion. This attitude is indeed serious, not just lip service.
Institutional accumulation works like this; retail investors should scream when it's a good time.
Those who follow big V influencers will regret it in the end. You still need to analyze the logic yourself.
ASTER's long-term deflation route is worth waiting and watching.
View OriginalReply0
SellLowExpert
· 01-06 21:50
Comments from the cutting-loss artist:
That wave at 0.81 was the batch I cut, now I feel a bit regretful haha
The destruction data does have some merit, but it feels a bit too idealized
I've heard the institution accumulation theory for three years, but I still don't know if it's true or not
Cutting losses based on emotions is so real, it always ends like this
Wait, will this destruction continue, or has it become just another PPT promise
View OriginalReply0
VibesOverCharts
· 01-06 21:50
I want to say, the 0.81 wave was really a moment of giving away tokens. Watching a bunch of people cut their losses, I feel sorry for them.
The destruction decreased from 8 billion to 7.922 billion. I like this attention to detail, it shows that the project team is not just talk.
I really don't understand the logic of cutting losses. Are you panicking just because it drops 10%?
Holding long-term is the way to go. Institutions have already been accumulating.
This adjustment is just filtering out retail investors. Those who remain are the smart money.
ASTER's pace is good, the destruction mechanism continues to advance, there is potential ahead.
Another group of traders driven by emotions, what a pity.
A few days ago, ASTER experienced a wave of correction around $0.81, which triggered different opinions in the market. On one side were those who cut losses in time, and on the other side were spectators complaining about the situation. To be honest, scenes like this happen periodically in the market, but a calm analysis often reveals that it is precisely the moment institutions are accumulating.
First, let's talk about the essence of this correction. Many participants initially entered ASTER for two main reasons: either they were attracted by the community hype or they followed the direction of influential figures. Once a 10% pullback occurs, their psychological expectations are shattered. Even if this small loss could be easily recovered in other assets, they still choose to cut their losses. This emotion-driven trading approach is fundamentally inefficient.
My reason for being bullish at this level is actually quite straightforward. The first is the destruction mechanism. Public data shows that the project team has already reduced the circulating supply from 8 billion to 7.922 billion. Some might think that a few tens of millions in burns is insignificant. But in crypto projects, the most important aspect of burns is attitude and sustainability. This move clearly demonstrates the project's commitment to deflation, which is not just marketing hype but a real effort to change the tokenomics.
During periods of market sentiment volatility, projects with solid fundamentals that are being sold off often accumulate the highest quality chips. ASTER's burn cycle is still ongoing, and at this pace, there is room for further imagination. Instead of following the emotional impulse to cut losses, it's better to understand the project's long-term logic.