2026-01-06 20:25:10

Year's first airdrop hit around $3,200—honestly solid for ranking somewhere in the 25th position. Wasn't anticipating much given the allocation remained a mystery until claiming went live, plus the project only kicked off with a ~400M FDV despite getting some high-profile attention. That said, the upside surprised me a bit. The initial valuation was pretty conservative; if it had launched closer to the 2B range early projects typically see, the payout picture would've looked dramatically different. Either way, shows how timing and FDV expectations shape airdrop outcomes in this market.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ShamedApeSeller

· 01-08 16:57

Just 3200 yuan is quite satisfying. Being ranked 25 and still able to do this? Underestimating the power of the project.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentPhobia

· 01-08 06:33

$3,200 for 25th place? Honestly, not bad. The only issue is that the FDV is too low; if it had opened at $2B, it would have doubled already.

View OriginalReply0

Web3Educator

· 01-06 20:51

ngl the fdv math here is wild—imagine if they'd gone 2b at launch, we'd be talking about totally different numbers. timing really is everything in this space, not gonna lie.

Reply0

DAOTruant

· 01-06 20:50

$3,200 for 25th place, not bad at all these days.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketMonk

· 01-06 20:45

3200 yuan for 25 positions, honestly, it's acceptable. But you see, this is a microcosm of that cycle — the initial FDV was suppressed low, leaving room for imagination later. Unlike those bubble projects in history, this indicates that market sentiment has finally learned to "control desire." It's just... if we really start from a 2B valuation, we'll have to rehash that old story again, just a survival bias.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeTears