2026-01-06 18:29:11

The surge in deepfakes and misinformation has become a critical pain point—Q1 2025 alone saw a 19% spike in such incidents, inflicting over $200 million in fraud losses worldwide. Against this backdrop, Layer 1 blockchain solutions are stepping up with concrete answers.

Zero-knowledge proofs now enable users to verify credentials privately without exposing sensitive data. Meanwhile, fair data monetization mechanisms empower individuals to own and profit from their information directly. What's more, portable reputation systems let your verified identity and credibility travel seamlessly across different platforms—no more starting from scratch on each new service.

These aren't just theoretical concepts; they're practical tools reshaping how trust and privacy work in a decentralized web. The question isn't whether blockchain solves these problems, but how quickly the ecosystem adopts these solutions.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OffchainWinner

· 01-08 17:47

NGL, zero-knowledge proofs sound really impressive, but can they really block deepfakes? It still seems like we have to rely on human judgment. The portable reputation system sounds good; no need to rebuild trust on every platform anymore, saving effort. Two hundred million dollars in scam losses... this number is outrageous. Can blockchain really save the day? The portable identity cross-platform idea is interesting; finally no more repeated verifications. It sounds good, but adoption rate is the real issue. No matter how strong the technology is, if no one uses it, it's pointless. These concepts are not new; the key is whether they can be implemented effectively. Don’t let them just become PPT proposals. Fair data monetization sounds like a pipe dream; can personal data really be that valuable? zk-proof is indeed a promising approach, but can the cost and speed meet the needs of the masses... A 19% growth rate is truly shocking; we need to find ways to curb it. Blockchain indeed has a knack for solving trust issues, but the ecosystem still needs to mature further.

View OriginalReply0

NFT_Therapy

· 01-08 00:47

Alright, it sounds great, but how many actually implement it in practice? --- Zero-knowledge proofs have been hyped for so long, but I still haven't seen many ordinary people using them... --- Finally, someone explained this thoroughly. Cross-platform identity drift is indeed a necessity. --- A loss of 200 million USD... and that's just Q1. It seems like the blockchain needs to step up. --- I believe in portability. It's really annoying to have to re-verify on every platform. --- The words sound nice, but the key is whether someone in the ecosystem has actually developed these tools. --- Wait, the data monetization mechanism... how to ensure it isn't exploited? --- Deepfakes are so rampant; it looks like Web3 needs to go live quickly. --- Let me ask, can L1 truly solve the information gap? Or is it just another round of hype?

View OriginalReply0

WhaleWatcher

· 01-06 18:59

Ngl, the ZK proof system sounds good, but how many of them are actually practical... Wait, can portable reputation really work across platforms? If that's true, it would have been popular long ago. A $2 billion scam... Every time I see this number, I feel it's too outrageous. Next year, it needs to double. I'm tired of the stories about blockchain saviors; the key is who is actually using it. Deepfake technology is getting more and more outrageous, but I'm more concerned about how to prevent it, not who promises to do so.

View OriginalReply0

VibesOverCharts

· 01-06 18:50

ZKP stuff sounds pretty good, but why are there so few actual applications? To put it nicely, how many projects have truly been implemented? Most are probably just bragging. Portable reputation sounds cool, but what if your identity gets stolen... isn't anyone discussing this? Deepfakes are projected to rise 19% by 2025? Wow, that's crazy. Having technology alone isn't enough; someone has to actually use it.

View OriginalReply0

GasOptimizer

· 01-06 18:43

zkproof sounds promising, but how many projects can truly be implemented? Most are still in the conceptual stage. --- I'm actually quite interested in portable reputation. Finally, I can get rid of the hassle of repeated verification on various platforms. --- 200 million in scam losses... That number is outrageous. Blockchain can't solve everything; it still depends on people not being greedy. --- The zero-knowledge set has been around for a long time. Now you're saying Layer1 is pushing it? That's a bit late to wake up. --- Talking about data ownership sounds nice, but who will actually buy your data... That's the real key issue. --- Here we go again with the blockchain hype. Not denying the technology, but I'm worried it's just another concept hype. --- Cross-platform reputation systems, just listen to the idea. Actual implementation is full of pitfalls.

View OriginalReply0

DAOTruant

· 01-06 18:33

zkproof sounds good, but can it really prevent deepfake? Feels like just hype around the concept. --- Portable reputation sounds very appealing, finally no need to start over on every platform. --- $200 million scam, and you're still discussing theories? It really counts when you start using it. --- I'm most interested in data monetization... how can we avoid getting cut? --- L1 solutions are so impressive, why are there still so few users? Is it too complicated? --- It sounds good in theory, but adoption is the key. Who is actually using these things right now? --- A bit too much imagination... can zero-knowledge proofs prevent deepfakes? Does this logic hold up?

View OriginalReply0

rugpull_survivor

· 01-06 18:32

Hmm, it's that old story of zero-knowledge proofs again... I've been hearing it for three years. Portable reputation is quite interesting; cross-platform identity without re-verification. It really needs to be implemented in practice. A scam loss of 2 billion dollars is quite frightening, but I'm more concerned about when it can actually be used. If this Layer1 solution turns out to be just another PPT project, I’ll laugh... I've already been burned once. Wait, can zero-knowledge proof really prevent deepfakes? I’m a bit unclear about that.

View OriginalReply0