2026-01-06 08:22:02

A major social media platform just rolled out a feature that lets users digitally manipulate photos of other people—essentially creating deepfake nude images without consent. The technology is already illegal in many jurisdictions, yet the platform continues operating without meaningful consequences. The gap between what's technically possible and what's legally permissible keeps widening. As AI tools become more accessible and harder to control, the question isn't just about technology—it's about enforcement. Why are regulatory bodies so slow to act when the violations are clear-cut?

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DegenMcsleepless

· 01-09 02:54

Deepfake nude photos really cross the line, and the platform is still pretending to be asleep.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropBlackHole

· 01-08 23:57

This platform is utterly outrageous, they don't even want to abide by the law, are regulators sleeping... Damn, they dare to directly promote deepfake nude photos? These regulatory agencies really have no teeth. To put it nicely, it's technological innovation; to be harsh, it's collective misconduct. This is too outrageous. Poor law enforcement has truly become a common problem, only reacting when a major incident occurs. This is ridiculous. Knowing it's illegal, they still proceed. Where do they get the confidence from? The platform's methods are just outrageous, laws are practically useless.

View OriginalReply0

SurvivorshipBias

· 01-08 08:03

Big platforms do whatever they want, even engaging in illegal activities. What are regulatory authorities really doing? --- Deepfake nude photos should have been banned long ago. Why are they still being used openly and publicly? --- Law can never keep up with technological speed. Honestly, this is the current dilemma. --- It's outrageous. Knowing it's illegal, they still operate. Fines for these big companies are like scratching an itch. --- If this happened to me, it would explode. Why can big platforms do whatever they want? --- Law enforcement is so slow it's infuriating. Who is really protecting these things? --- It's that same excuse: technological neutrality, users are responsible, anyway, we made a profit. --- Isn't this sexual violence? Just packaging features. Is no one really regulating this?

View OriginalReply0

LightningLady

· 01-06 08:51

Wow, really daring. No one is managing this? Are the regulatory authorities asleep or what?

View OriginalReply0

GasWrangler

· 01-06 08:49

ngl this is just demonstrably negligent on the enforcement side... if you analyze the data on how fast they can shut down financial protocols but drag their feet on actual harm? the throughput differential is insane. technically speaking, they've got the tools—transaction monitoring is trivial compared to what they claim they can't do here. sub-optimal prioritization, basically.

Reply0

RektRecorder

· 01-06 08:48

Hey, this is really outrageous. Is no one managing this? Laws can't keep up with technology.

View OriginalReply0

MoonRocketTeam

· 01-06 08:47

Bro, isn't this just technology directly burning through the legal bottom line? The regulatory agencies are still having coffee at the ground command center. This wave of platforms is really playing with fire. The gap between what technology can do and what the law can regulate is getting bigger and bigger. DYOR is the real truth. Deepfake really needs to be regulated, or this track will eventually shatter. Why is regulation so slow? Are they still waiting for AI to develop a sense of morality? This move by the platform is like self-destructing before even logging in. Truly outrageous.

View OriginalReply0

MrDecoder

· 01-06 08:45

This platform is really outrageous. Knowing it's illegal, they still go ahead. Are the regulatory authorities asleep?

View OriginalReply0

AltcoinMarathoner

· 01-06 08:40

ngl this is just like mile 20 vibes... regulators are still lacing up their shoes while the race is already halfway done. tech moves at sprint speed, enforcement moves at turtle pace. classic adoption curve misalignment tbh.

Reply0

ZKSherlock

· 01-06 08:28

actually, this is the classic gap between what's cryptographically possible and what's legally permissible, right? except way more dystopian. the platform literally said "we *can* do this" and regulators are still drafting memos. kinda like how nobody understood zero-knowledge proofs until they got exploited lol

Reply0