Uniswap founder clears the AMM vs Order Book debate


Uniswap founder Hayden Adams shared an important take today about why AMMs are not losing to order books.

He explained that in low-liquidity and small pairs, AMMs actually work better. They give steady returns to small liquidity providers and slowly reduce the advantage of big professional market makers.

For high-volatility and long-tail tokens, AMMs are basically the only system that can scale. Instead of projects paying high fees to market makers, early supporters and teams can provide liquidity themselves and earn more that way.

When it comes to big, popular tokens, AMMs are still growing. Order books work well right now, but AMM technology is still early. With upgrades like Uniswap v4 hooks, more efficient and profitable pools are expected in the future.

His main point: AMMs have lower costs, are easier to manage, and allow liquidity to be bundled and used as collateral. Over time, this could make AMMs the stronger system overall.
$UNI #cryptoupdate
UNI-3,08%
post-image
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
No comments
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)