2026-01-05 18:35:19

The flagship project in the ZK track, Starknet, experienced a network outage lasting up to 5 hours. This incident exposed the fragility of the current ecosystem infrastructure — seemingly hot ZK solutions still need more refinement in terms of stability. Interestingly, the market's reaction was quite muted; should we be worried or optimistic? Perhaps it indicates that everyone has become accustomed to technological iterations, or maybe the market has not yet fully recognized the long-term impact of such infrastructure risks. It is worth continuing to observe Starknet's subsequent troubleshooting and improvement plans.

STRK-1,64%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BearMarketHustler

· 14h ago

5 hours of downtime? This is what they call the next-generation scaling solution haha, feels like ZK still needs a few more years of training --- The market didn't react, which makes me even more anxious. Are people really numb or just indifferent? --- Starknet has been exposed again this time, but the real question is whether it can be fixed afterward... It's a bit hard to see through --- Such fragile infrastructure, what are you still bragging about? The promised production-level readiness? --- 5 hours... If this frequency continues a few more times, the ecosystem might cool down --- Getting used to it is the right attitude. Anyway, every Layer2 has to go through this test

View OriginalReply0

OnChain_Detective

· 18h ago

5 hours down and everyone's just... scrolling? nah this reeks of complacency. flagged this pattern before - when foundational layer infrastructure fails, nobody bats an eye until contagion spreads. starknet's stability issues = systemic risk indicator, data doesn't lie. market's sleeping on it but that's exactly when things compound. always DYOR on validator health metrics folks.

Reply0

BetterLuckyThanSmart

· 01-05 19:02

5-hour outage? That's nothing compared to what I've seen before... But Starknet really let us down this time. No matter how loud the hype, if the infrastructure isn't solid, it's all for nothing. The market didn't react, and I actually feel a bit indifferent. Everyone's too used to it, right? Anyway, every L2 has to go through its death throes.

View OriginalReply0

ShitcoinArbitrageur

· 01-05 19:01

5-hour downtime? This is the so-called next-generation scaling solution, haha... Luckily, I didn't put all my funds in.

View OriginalReply0

ThesisInvestor

· 01-05 18:51

5 hours of downtime with a calm response— is this market numbness or genuine indifference? Hard to say.

View OriginalReply0

AlwaysQuestioning

· 01-05 18:48

5 hours of downtime is really embarrassing, or is it that the ZK track is so prone to failure? --- By the way, the market reaction is so calm, maybe we should feel sorry for Starknet a bit. --- It's another infrastructure-level issue, and it seems these kinds of incidents are becoming more and more common. --- Can Starknet get through this wave? It seems like the next step depends on how they explain it. --- Market has always seemed to ignore infrastructure risks, but in the long run, it’s indeed a bit dangerous. --- I'm not trying to be negative, I just feel that ZK projects are a bit too rushed. --- 5 hours... recalling the failure records of some major projects before, this isn’t an isolated case. --- Not being surprised might really be a bad sign; I feel a bit numb about it.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoPunster

· 01-05 18:45

5 hours offline? Starknet is showing us live what "ZK doesn't know" really means.

View OriginalReply0

SilentObserver

· 01-05 18:39

5 hours of downtime, Starknet is really testing our patience... The market's lack of reaction is truly outrageous. If everyone wasn't numb, it would really mean they don't take infrastructure seriously.

View OriginalReply0