2026-01-05 16:24:54

The founder of Movement announced their departure on December 11th and immediately launched a new fund with a scale of $100 million focused on investing in other tokens. Coincidentally, Movement's token unlock window falls exactly between January 5th and 11th, with an estimated unlock scale of $7.15 million based on December prices. The founder's decision to leave just before a large unlock and shift towards investing in competitors itself raises questions. From a market perspective, the signals released by this behavior warrant in-depth consideration—why step back completely at this particular point?

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Blockwatcher9000

· 18h ago

Damn, this timing is too outrageous, running right before the unlock a week earlier? Truly impressive. --- Investing in competitors? Bro, isn't this just blatant arbitrage? --- $7.15 million is waiting to be unlocked, then they turn around and invest in someone else's coin. I just want to know what will happen to Movement next. --- This move is really something; not many founders can be so straightforward. --- Why does it feel like the crypto world is just this cycle of routines, going round and round? --- A $100 million fund vs. $7.15 million unlock. I’m a bit confused about how this calculation works. --- It's the classic "I'll run first, you guys do whatever" style.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeNightmare

· 01-06 18:36

Wow, this timing is just perfect. Landing on the unlock period on the eve of running away, really knows how to pick a day.

View OriginalReply0

HodlOrRegret

· 01-05 16:55

This timing is just too perfect... Resignation, a $100 million fund, about to unlock? I'm not kidding, the script is a bit stiff.

View OriginalReply0

FastLeaver

· 01-05 16:49

Wow, the timing is so ironic... Resignation + new fund + running before unlocking, who wrote this script?

View OriginalReply0

ForkYouPayMe

· 01-05 16:42

The classic "run away with the money" script, the timing is just too ridiculous... --- Tsk, it's the same old story again—resignation, new fund, investing in competitors... a game of dolls? --- Where's the long-term vision, buddy? Is this what you call a promise? --- I just want to ask, around number 115, haven't you sold your coins yet... --- An upgraded version of the rug pull art, learned it, learned it --- I can't watch this move, I just cover my face --- Haha, so this is what Web3 is all about, got it in my mind --- Disappearing right before unlocking, this scriptwriter is quite thorough

View OriginalReply0

CommunitySlacker

· 01-05 16:41

Damn, the timing is just too perfect. Are you really going to stay with us till the end? --- $7.15 million unlocked and ran away a week ago. That move is pretty ruthless, directly investing in competitors... --- I just want to know if this is a coincidence or something planned all along. Anyway, I believe it. --- Leaving a fund to invest in someone else's token? Not even your biological mother, more like a stepmother. --- I can't figure out what's going on with this timing, but I know I need to be smarter. --- Honestly, they deserve it. We should have been alert to these old tricks of front-running. --- Running away while investing in others—do they even have any shame, bro? --- The unlock date and the resignation date are so close—what a coincidence. --- Is that all? We're still in, and you just went to invest in others. --- I see through this deal. Exploiting information asymmetry to harvest profits is standard practice.

View OriginalReply0

LadderToolGuy

· 01-05 16:36

Running away before the sell-off, this tactic is really brilliant. A good show in the crypto world.

View OriginalReply0

RugpullTherapist

· 01-05 16:34

This timing is just too perfect... Where's the promised conviction?

View OriginalReply0