Regarding the recent abnormal fluctuations of the ASTER project, there is an angle worth considering. After an investment firm entered ASTER, they attempted to maintain communication with the project founder but unexpectedly found that the other party had completely gone offline. The investor's subsequent reaction was very straightforward—immediately initiating a stop-loss process and significantly liquidating their position.

The logical chain here is quite interesting. Normally, if it were just the founder temporarily busy or facing communication barriers, the investor might not act so decisively. But once they judge that there might be actual risks—such as the founding team members disappearing or being unreachable—then from a risk management perspective, withdrawing in time becomes the only option.

What’s even more bizarre is that the project’s current market value is still substantial, yet it faces such a situation. Later, news also circulated that key ASTER employees encountered special circumstances, making the entire incident even more perplexing. Is the founder also involved? What exactly happened within the project? These questions pile up, and it’s no wonder they have sparked widespread discussion within the community. From the investor’s decision-making, it’s clear they believe the risk has become uncontrollable.