When you're scouting the next big Web3 project, a few signals cut through the noise pretty fast.
Start with screen time—how long do people actually stick around? Apps that hook users don't need aggressive marketing. If people keep coming back day after day, that's your first clue something's working.
Then watch for the dopamine loop. The best products nail the feedback cycle—think sub-30 second interactions that feel snappy and rewarding. When every action gets a crisp response, users stay engaged. That's when you know the builders care about the experience, not just the feature set.
Don't sleep on frontend either. A polished interface isn't just pretty—it's proof the team sweats the details. Sloppy design usually signals sloppy thinking everywhere else. Clean UX means someone's actually thinking about how real people use this thing.
Combine these three, and you've got a solid framework for spotting projects worth your attention before they blow up.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
24 Likes
Reward
24
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SchrodingerWallet
· 01-08 07:30
That's right, it's all about retention rate and interaction speed—these two are the hardest to fake. I'm currently screening projects this way: if an app doesn't respond within 30 seconds, I just sell it directly. There's really no need to wait.
View OriginalReply0
DecentralizedElder
· 01-07 09:01
Really, looking at the retention data can truly reveal the truth; no need to listen to those marketing folks talking nonsense.
View OriginalReply0
GigaBrainAnon
· 01-06 06:56
Screen time really hits the mark. To see if a project can retain users, just look at the user reuse rate and you'll understand instantly.
View OriginalReply0
P2ENotWorking
· 01-05 09:54
Screen time really best explains the issue. Projects that are active every day are indeed different and much stronger than those that rely on marketing spending.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMisfit
· 01-05 09:54
Honestly, the screen time metric is truly amazing; it's more effective than reading any white paper.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSquirter
· 01-05 09:50
NGL, this logic is all about retention rate. Truly impressive projects have users who genuinely re-engage, and there's no need for daily airdrop temptations.
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfast
· 01-05 09:48
To be honest, the retention rate really hits the point. I've seen too many projects rely on marketing hype, but users can't be retained and have to be constantly acquired again, which will die sooner or later. Truly good products don't need to shout, they can spread on their own.
View OriginalReply0
ShibaOnTheRun
· 01-05 09:38
Speaking of which, screen time is indeed a truth detector. Many projects rely on aggressive marketing, and only a few can truly retain users.
How to spot emerging tech before the hype hits
When you're scouting the next big Web3 project, a few signals cut through the noise pretty fast.
Start with screen time—how long do people actually stick around? Apps that hook users don't need aggressive marketing. If people keep coming back day after day, that's your first clue something's working.
Then watch for the dopamine loop. The best products nail the feedback cycle—think sub-30 second interactions that feel snappy and rewarding. When every action gets a crisp response, users stay engaged. That's when you know the builders care about the experience, not just the feature set.
Don't sleep on frontend either. A polished interface isn't just pretty—it's proof the team sweats the details. Sloppy design usually signals sloppy thinking everywhere else. Clean UX means someone's actually thinking about how real people use this thing.
Combine these three, and you've got a solid framework for spotting projects worth your attention before they blow up.