The platform's algorithm shift toward article promotion follows a clear business logic: driving subscription revenue through premium tier adoption while simultaneously building a reputation as a home for substantive long-form discourse. Similar to how LinkedIn positioned itself around professional content, there's a deliberate infrastructure play here to attract serious creators. The strategy essentially redirects user attention toward higher-engagement content formats, creating a virtuous cycle where quality writing attracts both readers and writers. For those in the Web3 community who've been hesitant about long-form content creation, this could be the catalyst. The platform's commitment to surfacing in-depth analysis rather than quick takes opens real opportunity for contributors willing to invest in substantial pieces.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SchrodingersFOMO
· 01-08 05:05
ngl, this set of logic is just a rebranded version of LinkedIn's... I just don't know if Web3 can really stick around.
View OriginalReply0
MEVictim
· 01-07 18:48
Nah, I've seen this trick too many times. They just want you to spend money on a subscription...
View OriginalReply0
governance_ghost
· 01-07 02:58
NGL, this tactic is just like LinkedIn, trying to squeeze subscription fees from us and packaging it as a "high-quality content community" persona... really impressive.
View OriginalReply0
StakeOrRegret
· 01-05 09:53
Nah, it's just algorithm tricks. Basically, they just want people to shell out money for subscriptions.
View OriginalReply0
fomo_fighter
· 01-05 09:50
NGL, this algorithmic logic is really just about making money, but it's definitely good news for those who write in-depth analyses... finally no need to compete with those shitcoin quick news.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 01-05 09:49
This strategy is really clever, combining subscription fees and content quality to cut profits. They directly copied LinkedIn's approach.
View OriginalReply0
RektCoaster
· 01-05 09:48
ngl这套路就是想让我们掏钱...但长文确实比shitpost有营养多了
Reply0
0xLostKey
· 01-05 09:46
NGL, it's that same logic of "high-quality content attracts high-quality creators"... sounds great, but in the end, it's just subscription fees to harvest the users.
View OriginalReply0
GasGasGasBro
· 01-05 09:38
ngl, this round of algorithm adjustment is just to make us all obediently pay for subscriptions... but I have to say, in-depth content is indeed scarce.
View OriginalReply0
ProtocolRebel
· 01-05 09:33
Hey, really? Another paid game with "high-quality content." I see through it.
The platform's algorithm shift toward article promotion follows a clear business logic: driving subscription revenue through premium tier adoption while simultaneously building a reputation as a home for substantive long-form discourse. Similar to how LinkedIn positioned itself around professional content, there's a deliberate infrastructure play here to attract serious creators. The strategy essentially redirects user attention toward higher-engagement content formats, creating a virtuous cycle where quality writing attracts both readers and writers. For those in the Web3 community who've been hesitant about long-form content creation, this could be the catalyst. The platform's commitment to surfacing in-depth analysis rather than quick takes opens real opportunity for contributors willing to invest in substantial pieces.