As the new year begins, the US military actions against Venezuela have triggered a series of ripple effects across the global political arena and financial markets. The incident led to the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro, and then-US President Trump announced plans to take over the country's oil industry, immediately sparking a political storm domestically.
Congress opposition quickly stepped forward, with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer publicly criticizing the move as "reckless and deceptive," warning of Trump's intentions to control foreign resources. Public opinion exploded, but there is an interesting phenomenon here: the market responded with a completely different answer.
On two well-known political prediction platforms, Kalshi and Polymarket, the probability of Trump's impeachment actually decreased. The data on Polymarket is more straightforward—the likelihood of impeachment has fallen to about 10%. Traders clearly do not believe that this military action will directly threaten Trump's political standing.
Even more interesting is the performance of the token market. Cryptocurrencies related to Trump's personal brand experienced a noticeable rise within 24 hours after the event. WLFI tokens achieved double-digit growth, and TRUMP tokens rebounded, re-entering the top 100 by market cap.
This creates a market dislocation phenomenon: the traditional political risk assessments predicting an impeachment crisis did not materialize, but related crypto assets signaled a bullish outlook. This may indicate that, in the current market environment, some participants interpret Trump's aggressive actions as a strengthening of power rather than a weakening, thereby pushing up the prices of related assets. The two sets of logic—politics and markets—clash right before our eyes.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenRationEater
· 01-08 07:58
Schumer's words sound nice, but traders don't listen. The impeachment probability dropping to 10% says it all.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBlindCat
· 01-07 13:23
Oh my, Schumer is shouting again, but the crypto circle is actually well-fed
Can't hold back anymore, the impeachment probability can still drop to 10%... Traders are really betting on Trump as a superhero
TRUMP coin has risen back into the top hundred, I wonder how many people are betting on him to fix Venezuela's oil
Traditional politics and the crypto world follow two different logics, and that's where the absurdity lies
Compared to the rising coin prices, who do you think better represents the true sentiment: Schumer's opposition or the market?
WLFI has doubled in value, is this token really valuable or just for fun?
The political risk assessment system has collapsed, the market has long been voting with money
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter
· 01-05 08:59
yo wait... polymarket impeachment odds *dropping* while TRUMP tokens pump? that's not market inefficiency, that's literally just the flow telling you who's actually positioning. traditional finance still thinks in terms of "scandal = career death" lol... meanwhile the actual smart money already priced in that this strengthens his hand. arbitrage spread between sentiment and execution never lies fr
Reply0
TradFiRefugee
· 01-05 08:58
Haha, politicians say no, but the crypto wallets are very honest.
Impeachment probability drops to 10%, TRUMP coin hits the daily limit, this is what it means when the market understands politics better than public opinion...
Has Schumer lost his voice? Anyway, the money is really coming in.
People are just tough-talking, claiming to be radical, then turning around and going all in on Trump concept coins, hilarious.
This wave is actually a power game allocation, the signals are very clear.
Don’t listen to political shows, just follow the capital flow.
Political risk? Come on, traders are calculating returns, not moral standards.
Typical of saying one thing and doing another, who would believe Schumer’s act?
Military actions are actually increasing? This time, it’s a different perspective to understand it.
The market has already priced it in, now it’s a question of whether to chase the rally or wait and see.
WLFI TRUMP’s rebound this time is a bit outrageous, but the logic is consistent.
Trump concept coins taking off indicates the market perceives him as more stable.
View OriginalReply0
TheMemefather
· 01-05 08:53
The market doesn't lie, and even Schumer's loudest calls can't change traders' judgments.
As the new year begins, the US military actions against Venezuela have triggered a series of ripple effects across the global political arena and financial markets. The incident led to the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro, and then-US President Trump announced plans to take over the country's oil industry, immediately sparking a political storm domestically.
Congress opposition quickly stepped forward, with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer publicly criticizing the move as "reckless and deceptive," warning of Trump's intentions to control foreign resources. Public opinion exploded, but there is an interesting phenomenon here: the market responded with a completely different answer.
On two well-known political prediction platforms, Kalshi and Polymarket, the probability of Trump's impeachment actually decreased. The data on Polymarket is more straightforward—the likelihood of impeachment has fallen to about 10%. Traders clearly do not believe that this military action will directly threaten Trump's political standing.
Even more interesting is the performance of the token market. Cryptocurrencies related to Trump's personal brand experienced a noticeable rise within 24 hours after the event. WLFI tokens achieved double-digit growth, and TRUMP tokens rebounded, re-entering the top 100 by market cap.
This creates a market dislocation phenomenon: the traditional political risk assessments predicting an impeachment crisis did not materialize, but related crypto assets signaled a bullish outlook. This may indicate that, in the current market environment, some participants interpret Trump's aggressive actions as a strengthening of power rather than a weakening, thereby pushing up the prices of related assets. The two sets of logic—politics and markets—clash right before our eyes.