Bitcoin has been around for 17 years. Looking back to the genesis block, it contains the deepest skepticism towards centralized financial power — not through fierce condemnation, but by answering with code: what if money is detached from the control of authorities?
Over these 17 years, Bitcoin has used a mechanism that no one can tamper with and no one has privileges over, repeatedly questioning this issue. No central bank, no issuance rights held by a few, only algorithms, consensus, and cryptography.
Compared to traditional financial systems, this contrast is particularly profound. When power is decentralized to every node in the network, and rules are determined by code rather than government orders, is humanity truly ready? This is not only a technical issue but also a rethinking of the financial system itself. Bitcoin has not provided an answer, but it has never stopped asking questions over the past 17 years.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ContractFreelancer
· 01-06 09:02
After 17 years, you're still asking the same question, which shows that the answer is not simple at all.
View OriginalReply0
MerkleDreamer
· 01-06 04:19
Really, code speaks louder than words, and after 17 years, you're still asking the same question...
View OriginalReply0
AirdropAutomaton
· 01-05 08:56
To be honest, these 17 years of Bitcoin have been asking one question — can we really trust code more than trust in authority?
View OriginalReply0
OnlyUpOnly
· 01-05 08:56
To be honest, I think the most ruthless aspect of Bitcoin isn't the technology itself, but the fact that it exposes the core issue that hits the power hierarchy.
Algorithms don't lie, and everyone is equal before the code... It sounds like a dream, but at least we're trying.
View OriginalReply0
FreeRider
· 01-05 08:55
Really, the idea that "code is law" sounds great, but in reality, we still have to eat... Decentralizing power to every node sounds wonderful, but ordinary people can't participate in mining at all, and in the end, it's still big capital that profits...
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-1a2ed0b9
· 01-05 08:55
Wow, it's been 17 years, and this guy is still asking the same question. But on the other hand, are we really ready? I'm not ready.
View OriginalReply0
LonelyAnchorman
· 01-05 08:54
Woke up to find it went up again, no, it went down again... Never mind, I can't explain it clearly either.
View OriginalReply0
YieldWhisperer
· 01-05 08:54
Honestly, after 17 years, asking the same question is a bit interesting. What can code really change?
View OriginalReply0
FlyingLeek
· 01-05 08:49
Basically, it's about saying no to power. The code is much more firm than words.
Bitcoin has been around for 17 years. Looking back to the genesis block, it contains the deepest skepticism towards centralized financial power — not through fierce condemnation, but by answering with code: what if money is detached from the control of authorities?
Over these 17 years, Bitcoin has used a mechanism that no one can tamper with and no one has privileges over, repeatedly questioning this issue. No central bank, no issuance rights held by a few, only algorithms, consensus, and cryptography.
Compared to traditional financial systems, this contrast is particularly profound. When power is decentralized to every node in the network, and rules are determined by code rather than government orders, is humanity truly ready? This is not only a technical issue but also a rethinking of the financial system itself. Bitcoin has not provided an answer, but it has never stopped asking questions over the past 17 years.