In early 2026, the prediction market platform Opinion encountered an issue when settling markets related to MetaMask. Events that should have been settled as No were mistakenly marked as Yes, resulting in settlement errors.
The platform later responded that this was a malfunction in the AI oracle during the "information source indexing" phase. Simply put, the AI experienced biases when retrieving and processing data sources, ultimately leading to incorrect prediction results. This incident also exposed the current prediction market platforms' high dependence on AI oracles, but with immature risk control mechanisms. Similar technical failures serve as a reminder to participants that greater caution is needed when using such platforms.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-40edb63b
· 01-07 06:00
AI oracle failed again, which is why I never put all my assets on these platforms... If the settlement is wrong, I guess I have to rely on their mood for compensation.
View OriginalReply0
ForkYouPayMe
· 01-06 02:17
AI oracle has failed again. To put it simply, it was a data feeding issue—fed the wrong data, and the settlement was reversed... How can we continue to predict the market like this?
View OriginalReply0
LeekCutter
· 01-05 08:52
AI messed up again, and we have to clean up the mess.
View OriginalReply0
BTCRetirementFund
· 01-05 08:39
Is AI indexing causing issues? That's ridiculous; it feels like the prediction market isn't mature yet.
View OriginalReply0
BloodInStreets
· 01-05 08:33
AI index has a bug. This is what they call a decentralized prediction market. It's hilarious—better to go to a casino for reliability.
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBroke
· 01-05 08:31
Haha, this is ridiculous. AI can even read No as Yes? How unreliable is this thing?
It's not the first time. Predictive markets really keep screwing up one after another.
Basically, it's an over-reliance on AI oracles, and risk control is virtually nonexistent.
If you ask me, platforms like these should have more manual review steps and not rely entirely on unreliable AI.
I've said it before, this industry is too risky; retail investors just end up losing money.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeNomad
· 01-05 08:31
ngl, ai oracle indexing failures hitting different than traditional bridge exploits... at least with bridging mechanics you can trace the attack vector, but this? data source drift in production is basically asking to get rekt. seen this movie before with the older oracles, never ends well 🚨
In early 2026, the prediction market platform Opinion encountered an issue when settling markets related to MetaMask. Events that should have been settled as No were mistakenly marked as Yes, resulting in settlement errors.
The platform later responded that this was a malfunction in the AI oracle during the "information source indexing" phase. Simply put, the AI experienced biases when retrieving and processing data sources, ultimately leading to incorrect prediction results. This incident also exposed the current prediction market platforms' high dependence on AI oracles, but with immature risk control mechanisms. Similar technical failures serve as a reminder to participants that greater caution is needed when using such platforms.