Crypto circles say the memory only lasts seven seconds, but the more you try to shake off certain projects, the more they tend to grow into things you can't escape. APRO is exactly like that—while everyone is chasing 100x meme coins, it quietly spent two years embedding itself into the three hottest tracks: AI, RWA, and Bitcoin ecosystems. The story isn't as glamorous as overnight riches; instead, it's like answering a classic question: how to go from "no one wants it" to "everyone can't live without it."
**Starting with scratching your own itch**
The reason for APRO's creation is straightforward: a group of DeFi and AI developers were fed up with data experience issues. Early smart contracts were like blind snipers—they wrote perfect code but couldn't see through real-world complexities. Back then, oracles had only three options: either ridiculously expensive, painfully slow, or just a black box. APRO didn't aim to overthrow the entire market; it just wanted to fix the problems within its own house—a data layer that functions like native chain features rather than being forcibly stitched in from outside.
The early days were all hard work:
**Push or pull?** How to get data onto the chain? They offered two options—push (continuous updates) and pull (cost-effective on demand). Sounds simple, but in a decentralized world, making both modes fast and secure without crashes was no small feat.
**Who says what is true?** This is the core dilemma for decentralized oracles. Their answer was an additional AI verification layer. Not to replace the consensus mechanism of nodes, but to add an "AI risk control" step—automatically vet data before it goes on-chain. The idea sounds simple, but the implementation complexity is entirely different.
From "house leaking" to "others want to use it," APRO's story unfolds step by step.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-bd883c58
· 19h ago
It took two years to realize that they weren't messing around at all; they really have something.
View OriginalReply0
MevShadowranger
· 01-06 16:23
Well, no. I've seen this trick of holding back a big move for two years several times, and in the end, it still failed.
To be honest, the oracle sector really faces bottlenecks, but APRO's success today isn't entirely due to technology.
I'm convinced by the move to bet on the AI track. RWA is really about to take off.
Wait, are their AI verification layers reliable? Could it just be a shell game again?
Forget it, at least it's more solid than those projects that rely solely on marketing. I have to admit that.
Projects that accumulate slowly over time are often the true winners, but unfortunately, most people won't wait that long.
View OriginalReply0
RebaseVictim
· 01-05 08:53
Another storyteller has arrived, but this time I don't feel like I was tricked into buying haha
It's true that two years of sharpening the sword isn't as satisfying as getting rich overnight, but it seems APRO is indeed solving real problems rather than just hyping concepts
Oracles have definitely been a pitfall before, with the deadly combo of high cost + slow speed + black box, leaving a psychological shadow
But I just want to ask, can we really trust the AI verification layer, or is it just another trick of dressing up old wine in new bottles
Anyway, I'll keep observing for now, and hope I won't be the one to cut my losses again
View OriginalReply0
ForkThisDAO
· 01-05 08:51
Honestly, I like this pace. Doing things low-key is better than anything else.
It's not just another story-teller; they're really just piling things up.
Two years... I was just thinking why this guy hasn't moved yet.
The combination of AI + RWA is pretty fierce and really hard to replicate.
Oracles have been exploited quite badly before. If someone wants to do it seriously, it's still rare.
View OriginalReply0
PretendingToReadDocs
· 01-05 08:47
Wait, they've been planning this two years ago? Why do I feel like I missed something?
It should have been the time to get on board, but now it might be a bit late to enter the market.
Oracles are indeed a bottleneck, but whether AI verification is reliable still depends on what happens next.
This set of logic sounds comfortable, but I'm just worried it might be another PPT project.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeGazer
· 01-05 08:39
This routine sounds pretty familiar, another narrative of "quietly working hard for two years," the crypto world flavor is really strong.
Two years ago, who the hell knew what it was? Now you're convinced it’s nailed into three tracks?
Oracles have been around for a long time, so why is APRO any different? What about the details?
Thinking back, I’ve also been hyped about projects like this before.
But to be fair, at least they’re trying to solve real problems, which is somewhat acceptable.
View OriginalReply0
StakeHouseDirector
· 01-05 08:38
Damn, isn't this a perfect example of quietly doing the right thing, while those who shout about hundredfold returns every day are no longer remembered?
View OriginalReply0
GasWaster
· 01-05 08:36
ngl this push vs pull thing sounds like choosing between overpaying for push notifications or waiting forever for pull requests... been there, failed that tx twice already
Crypto circles say the memory only lasts seven seconds, but the more you try to shake off certain projects, the more they tend to grow into things you can't escape. APRO is exactly like that—while everyone is chasing 100x meme coins, it quietly spent two years embedding itself into the three hottest tracks: AI, RWA, and Bitcoin ecosystems. The story isn't as glamorous as overnight riches; instead, it's like answering a classic question: how to go from "no one wants it" to "everyone can't live without it."
**Starting with scratching your own itch**
The reason for APRO's creation is straightforward: a group of DeFi and AI developers were fed up with data experience issues. Early smart contracts were like blind snipers—they wrote perfect code but couldn't see through real-world complexities. Back then, oracles had only three options: either ridiculously expensive, painfully slow, or just a black box. APRO didn't aim to overthrow the entire market; it just wanted to fix the problems within its own house—a data layer that functions like native chain features rather than being forcibly stitched in from outside.
The early days were all hard work:
**Push or pull?** How to get data onto the chain? They offered two options—push (continuous updates) and pull (cost-effective on demand). Sounds simple, but in a decentralized world, making both modes fast and secure without crashes was no small feat.
**Who says what is true?** This is the core dilemma for decentralized oracles. Their answer was an additional AI verification layer. Not to replace the consensus mechanism of nodes, but to add an "AI risk control" step—automatically vet data before it goes on-chain. The idea sounds simple, but the implementation complexity is entirely different.
From "house leaking" to "others want to use it," APRO's story unfolds step by step.