2026-01-05 08:20:14

By 2026, the crypto market had already shown strong upward momentum. Due to the weekend geopolitical situation, the US stock market had not opened yet, but crypto trading was already bustling—ranging from Bitcoin to Meme coins, with considerable gains across the board.

Specifically, the market performed remarkably: Bitcoin broke through the $93,000 mark, reaching a new high since early December; the Meme coin sector experienced a concentrated surge, with many tokens recording double-digit increases; the total market capitalization of cryptocurrencies increased by approximately $200 billion compared to New Year's Day.

This wave of market activity demonstrates the independence and vibrancy of the crypto market. While traditional finance was still on the sidelines, on-chain transactions had already set the tone for the new year with tangible actions. Whether this marks the beginning of a new cycle or a short-term rebound, the subsequent trend warrants ongoing attention.

BTC0,39%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ParallelChainMaxi

· 18h ago

93k already, is this really going to take off this time? Or is it just another trap?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropFatigue

· 01-07 02:00

The crypto circle is hyping itself again, while the US stock market hasn't even woken up, and we've already surged. Is this really different this time? Wait, Meme coins in double digits? That's pretty intense. Are we about to take off or just eat noodles? We've already broken 93,000. Why am I still watching the market and not daring to act... Two trillion in incremental volume sounds great, but it feels like the same old tricks as in previous years. Is this really a new cycle, bro? The independence of crypto is indeed absolute. I'm just worried that it might all turn out to be another empty joy later.

View OriginalReply0

WagmiAnon

· 01-06 12:03

Bitcoin has reached 93k, and Meme coins are even crazier. Just a few days into the new year, and it's already surging so strongly... But be careful not to fall into a rebound trap.

View OriginalReply0

WalletDivorcer

· 01-05 08:49

The US stock market hasn't woken up yet, but we're already celebrating on the chain. That's the advantage of crypto. It's already at 93k, but a double-digit increase in meme coins... be careful not to become the bagholder. A market cap increase to 200 billion sounds impressive, but I just don't know if there will be another wave of sharp decline. We've been through it too many times.

View OriginalReply0

rugdoc.eth

· 01-05 08:46

Bitcoin has reached 93k, still debating the cycle? Going all in is the true gambler's spirit.

View OriginalReply0

OvertimeSquid

· 01-05 08:42

93,000 is really impressive, but you need to be able to hold this wave of gains. Meme coins with double-digit increases, it feels like another signal of a pump and dump. Starting the new year with a 200 billion market cap increase, this pace is a bit outrageous. Bitcoin keeps hitting new highs—is the cycle really coming, or is it just a temporary rebound? Centralized exchanges are starting to act up; retail investors should be careful not to get liquidated. Let's wait and see when the US stock market opens; too many people are going all-in right now.

View OriginalReply0

YieldHunter

· 01-05 08:40

btc above 93k sounds nice on paper, but let me see the actual vol metrics... meme coin pumps always look explosive until you check the liquidity depth lol. that 200b market cap jump? if you look at the data, half of it's probably just correlation with btc's move. sustainable returns or classic dead cat bounce, we'll find out in like 2 weeks ngl

Reply0

LuckyBlindCat

· 01-05 08:22

Damn, it's already at 93k. I still didn't buy in when it was at 20k, now I'm kicking myself for not acting earlier.

View OriginalReply0