When you dig into those performance metrics on Sei, you're looking at something that fundamentally shifts what's possible on Layer 1.
Let's break down the gap: ~400 milliseconds finality here versus 5 seconds elsewhere—and honestly, that's not a small difference. In blockchain, 5 seconds feels like forever. Then there's the throughput: Giga gas per second with roughly 200K transactions per second capacity.
Here's what matters: applications that simply cannot operate under existing constraints suddenly become viable. High-frequency trading, real-time gaming, flash-loan arbitrage at scale—these aren't just incremental improvements. This is the infrastructure layer that enables the next generation of on-chain activity.
The performance ceiling you hit on other L1s stops being a problem. Instead of building workarounds, developers get to actually build.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCryer
· 01-08 04:15
400 milliseconds versus 5 seconds? Sei is just crushing it, not joking with you.
---
200,000 TPS sounds unbelievable, but if it can really run HFT and real-time games... then the game truly changes.
---
Instead of hacking around with workarounds, it's better to let developers build happily—this is the infrastructure I want to see.
---
The question is whether Sei can maintain this performance steadily; otherwise, it will just be another PPT coin.
---
Giga gas per second sounds impressive, but the key is whether the ecosystem can keep up.
View OriginalReply0
ShadowStaker
· 01-07 11:12
ngl the 400ms finality is cool and all, but let's not pretend sei's validator set isn't a centralization minefield waiting to happen. who's actually running these nodes?
Reply0
ImpermanentPhilosopher
· 01-06 18:58
400 milliseconds vs 5 seconds, this difference can really change the game rules
---
Sei's performance metrics are indeed impressive, but I'm more concerned about whether real-world applications are keeping up
---
High-frequency trading, real-time gaming all sound great, but currently the main users are still arbitrage traders. Is it possible?
---
Don't fall into the trap of just impressive on paper data with no actual users coming
---
200K TPS sounds awesome, but I just don't know how decentralized it is. L1 performance and security always have to be balanced, right?
---
Developers being able to truly build rather than just patch things up is definitely worth looking forward to, but the ecosystem still depends on time to mature
View OriginalReply0
MEVEye
· 01-05 07:58
400ms vs 5s, this gap is life or death on the chain. Finally, someone has explained this clearly.
---
Giga gas sounds great, but the real key is that high-frequency trading can finally be played. Previously, we had to compromise.
---
Exactly, no need to rack your brain for workarounds anymore. Direct development is the right way.
---
200k TPS is revolutionary; the gameplay of the MEV game will be completely changed.
---
The ceiling of L1 performance has been shattered. Developers can finally do what they want.
---
Flash loan arbitrage on chain truly scales up. This is what infrastructure should look like.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-afe07a92
· 01-05 07:56
400 milliseconds versus 5 seconds, this difference can really change the game
---
Honestly, when I see this performance metric of sei, I think of other L1 workarounds, it's really too much hassle
---
200,000 TPS sounds impressive, but whether the actual on-chain activity can really run at that level is another story
---
High-frequency trading and chain games suddenly feasible? If it really materializes, it could be explosive
---
Another "next-generation infrastructure," I'm tired of hearing this kind of talk haha
---
The comparison of 400ms versus 5s is a bit over the top, is the actual experience really that different?
---
Giga gas sounds awesome, but I'm just worried it might be another marketing gimmick
---
Developers truly building instead of just doing workarounds, I have to admit, that's really tempting
---
Flash loan arbitrage scaling up, some people might start to get restless
View OriginalReply0
RugPullSurvivor
· 01-05 07:54
400 milliseconds to 5 seconds, this gap can indeed change the game rules
---
200K TPS sounds great, but can it really reach this number in practice? Or is it just on paper
---
High-frequency trading and flash loans can finally be played normally. Those L1s before were really frustrating
---
They talk big, but let's wait six months to see if Sei can really hold up these metrics
---
Developers no longer need to think about workarounds all day; just build directly. This is the infrastructure I want
---
400ms finality sounds very sexy, but the ecosystem is the key. Are there any applications?
View OriginalReply0
JustAnotherWallet
· 01-05 07:41
400 milliseconds versus 5 seconds, honestly, the gap is indeed quite significant.
ngl sei, this performance metric looks really impressive, 200k TPS—what a concept, other L1s must be very envious.
High-frequency trading finally can run smoothly now; those previously bottlenecked applications now have a way forward.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBro
· 01-05 07:41
400 milliseconds versus 5 seconds—can that really change the game? It feels a bit exaggerated.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationKing
· 01-05 07:41
400ms vs 5 seconds, this gap truly breaks the ceiling, finally an L1 daring to play like this
---
sei's performance metrics... really eye-opening, high-frequency trading can finally come alive
---
200k tps is not a joke, developers can finally ditch those bizarre workarounds
---
The previous limitations of those L1s cut the possibilities in half, now finally feeling proud
---
"5 seconds equals a century" is such a perfect way to put it haha, sei really gets it
---
If real-time gaming can run smoothly, then that's the true explosion of on-chain applications
---
It's just infrastructure upgrade, but this upgrade is indeed powerful, not a small improvement
View OriginalReply0
DegenGambler
· 01-05 07:37
400 milliseconds versus 5 seconds? That’s a huge gap, finally allowing the chain to breathe
---
200k TPS sounds great, but can it really stay stable, or is it just another round of hype
---
High-frequency trading and gaming can really take off, that would be a breakthrough, everything else is just showmanship
---
No nonsense, if Sei can truly deliver on these metrics, developers will definitely have a smoother path
---
The old familiar performance narrative, let’s wait until the real dApp launches before discussing further
---
Finally, there’s an L1 daring to challenge Ethereum’s sluggish speed, it’s about time
When you dig into those performance metrics on Sei, you're looking at something that fundamentally shifts what's possible on Layer 1.
Let's break down the gap: ~400 milliseconds finality here versus 5 seconds elsewhere—and honestly, that's not a small difference. In blockchain, 5 seconds feels like forever. Then there's the throughput: Giga gas per second with roughly 200K transactions per second capacity.
Here's what matters: applications that simply cannot operate under existing constraints suddenly become viable. High-frequency trading, real-time gaming, flash-loan arbitrage at scale—these aren't just incremental improvements. This is the infrastructure layer that enables the next generation of on-chain activity.
The performance ceiling you hit on other L1s stops being a problem. Instead of building workarounds, developers get to actually build.