Last night, I set three short positions: 91666, 92888, 94333. I originally planned to cancel all orders before sleep, but in the end, only the order at the lowest level 91666 was canceled. It wasn't until this morning that I realized the short at 92888 actually executed, and now I find myself in a dilemma of whether to hold or cut.



This semi-hedged state really makes people uncomfortable. Although the position at 92888 has some profit potential, if the market rebounds and breaks through this level, the risk will spike sharply. Conversely, if the trend continues downward, this position still yields decent returns.

Many people have encountered similar trading awkwardness—partial risk hedging can actually increase uncertainty. The key question is: what is your judgment on the subsequent trend? The lower order at 94333 is still active, providing some extra protection, but it also means your actual risk exposure remains quite high.

Some choose to hold and bet on a downward trend; others decide to close the position on a rebound at a key resistance level to lock in partial profits. The lesson here might be: for large positions, order cancellations require more cautious confirmation mechanisms.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FUD_Whisperervip
· 01-08 00:13
Haha, this is the legendary "sleep trading" trap, I've fallen for it too...
View OriginalReply0
just_another_walletvip
· 01-07 19:21
Oh no, this is a typical slip-up situation. I only realized after waking up that 92888 was eaten.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightSellervip
· 01-05 07:57
It's that feeling of slipping up in the middle of the night again, truly incredible. 92888 is stuck there, can't tell if it's a blessing or a curse, just see how things unfold later. I already said it, big orders must have a stop-loss list, otherwise you'll be stuck in this kind of dilemma.
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicatorvip
· 01-05 07:36
This is awkward now, being stuck at 92888 in the middle is the most uncomfortable Sleep cost, everyone, just got swept away like that 94333 is still holding, either endure it all at once or admit defeat, half-position is the most tormenting Large transactions definitely need a alarm clock, relying on memory alone isn't enough If the rebound breaks 92888, we're completely finished... better to reduce some positions in advance to feel better mentally
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivorvip
· 01-05 07:35
It's the cost of placing orders late at night and not getting enough sleep again. I speak from experience.
View OriginalReply0
MevWhisperervip
· 01-05 07:35
Haha, I understand this wave of order cancellations failed, surprises during sleep are the most deadly. The moment I saw the order wasn't fully canceled in the morning, it was so embarrassing... Now I'm just betting on what happens next. 94333 still feels like it's protected, and I think I can give it a shot, but the risk exposure hanging like this is really uncomfortable.
View OriginalReply0
BoredRiceBallvip
· 01-05 07:35
Oh no, this is awkward. The 92888 transaction was really a mistake in operation.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)