2026-01-05 07:26:10

Many people see the rise of MEME coins as a miracle, thinking that as long as there's hype and a few violent K-line candles, that's enough. Honestly, this kind of thrill is indeed intoxicating, but like fireworks, after the brilliance, nothing is left.

Truly enduring MEME projects are not based on this logic. Look at the projects that are still around; behind them, there are real people doing real work — the community is holding up the project, consensus is supporting it, and waves of people are doing ground promotions, gradually bringing new players into this ecosystem.

MEME coins built this way are not surprising to rise, and they won't die easily when they fall. Because beneath the price, it's not some big player controlling the market, but a group of living, breathing people. They believe in this thing and are willing to stay here. That is true resilience.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ZKProofEnthusiast

· 01-06 16:04

Well said, that's exactly what I want to hear. Those who just ride the hype and then run will eventually suffer losses. Real meme coins need someone to hold them, otherwise it's just a castle in the air.

View OriginalReply0

Layer2Observer

· 01-06 09:56

Well, from the data perspective, it indeed validates this point — projects that truly survive can be evidenced by their holder distribution charts. --- Compared to the brilliance of candlestick charts, I am more concerned with community stickiness indicators, which are technically harder to fake. --- Theoretically, any price increase without genuine consensus support is essentially a liquidity illusion. --- There's a misconception here; many people are still confusing price volatility with ecosystem resilience — these are two different things. --- Projects whose source code you've reviewed and those purely for quick gains can be distinguished from their governance structures. --- Let me see the data — what proportion of the remaining meme projects' grassroots marketing costs account for? --- An interesting discovery: the difference between genuine faith projects and pump-and-dump tokens is whether people continue to build after a 50% drop. --- From an engineering perspective, community consensus is actually the best liquidity provider — more reliable than anything else.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-75ee51e7

· 01-05 07:56

That's true, but the reality is that 99% of people won't wait for that day at all; they've already cut their losses and run.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseMigrant

· 01-05 07:51

That's very true. The big players who cut the leeks have long since run away; only the true believers are holding on stubbornly. Honestly, this wave of MEME has no fundamental consensus; even if it’s hyped up, it’s just a mirage. Community is the key; the so-called market makers are just clouds. People who obsess over K-line charts every day will eventually kneel. This is called investing, not gambling. It takes real action to make a difference; just shouting slogans is useless. Basically, it’s about whether you believe or not; those who believe will naturally stay.

View OriginalReply0

NFT_Therapy_Group

· 01-05 07:39

That really hits home. Those chasing quick money are all just leeks with a mentality. Truly successful MEME projects rely on popularity, not the Ponzi scheme approach. Bro, what you said hits the nail on the head. Most people are still dreaming. Community consensus is the moat; without it, everything is pointless. Seeing through it all, I understand much better than most. But to be honest, how many projects can really make it to that stage... This is what a MEME coin should look like, but unfortunately, too few people understand.

View OriginalReply0

DeadTrades_Walking

· 01-05 07:31

You're right, right now many people are just betting on those few candlesticks, and there's really nothing to play with. That's the real nonsense—having a community and consensus is what makes it a game; otherwise, it's just hot potato. The community ecosystem is indeed very effective, much more reliable than the manipulations of the big players. Even if it drops, there's no need to fear; this is the fundamental way to withstand pressure.

View OriginalReply0

WagmiOrRekt

· 01-05 07:30

That's so true; I'm just afraid that most people don't see this. The thrill of getting rich overnight is far less solid than gradually building an ecosystem.

View OriginalReply0