This year, I stopped loss on one project in my investment portfolio, which is still a bit regrettable. The situation with that team was indeed complicated, mainly due to the lack of strong core leadership support. However, this also reflects the current state of the exchange track — truly capable innovative teams are still too scarce.
Thinking carefully about my allocation logic: I am firmly optimistic about $BTC and $BCH in the POW chain sector, as they are truly consensus assets. In the public chain track, $ETH maintains a solid position with obvious ecological advantages. For stablecoins, I choose $WLFI, considering both liquidity and risk comprehensively. In the exchange sector, $BNB is currently the leader, but honestly, I look forward to seeing new stars emerge in the exchange track — projects with real talent, complete teams, and a willingness to invest long-term.
The crypto market needs more potential new faces like this, not just trend-following projects chasing hot topics.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RugPullProphet
· 01-05 23:14
Stop-loss is just that—no regrets. Only by staying alive can you continue to make money.
A team without leadership doesn't deserve to survive. There are too many projects like exchange tracks.
Consensus assets like BTC and ETH are the real kingpins; others are just supporting roles.
The real issue is that genuinely reliable new projects are too few; most are just PPT presentations and fundraising stories.
View OriginalReply0
just_another_fish
· 01-05 07:53
Stop-loss is just that, a stop-loss. Anyway, there are plenty of bad projects in this space, the key is whether the team is reliable.
$BTC $ETH still the same old three, no matter how fancy the new project is, I don't believe it.
View OriginalReply0
SolidityStruggler
· 01-05 07:53
The moment of stop loss was a bit heartbreaking, but looking at your setup... it's actually quite solid. I get the faith in BTC and BCH, but when it comes to the exchange sector, you really need to look at new projects. You can't just keep BNB bound all the time.
View OriginalReply0
MissedAirdropBro
· 01-05 07:49
Stop-loss is the right move, but the team really underperformed. Compared to $BNB, which is still the top trend, the exchange sector really lacks strong players.
View OriginalReply0
GamefiGreenie
· 01-05 07:35
Stop loss if you need to, dying early and rebirth sooner is better than being trapped forever.
View OriginalReply0
fork_in_the_road
· 01-05 07:34
Stop-loss is done correctly. Some projects are indeed not worth holding on to desperately.
This year, I stopped loss on one project in my investment portfolio, which is still a bit regrettable. The situation with that team was indeed complicated, mainly due to the lack of strong core leadership support. However, this also reflects the current state of the exchange track — truly capable innovative teams are still too scarce.
Thinking carefully about my allocation logic: I am firmly optimistic about $BTC and $BCH in the POW chain sector, as they are truly consensus assets. In the public chain track, $ETH maintains a solid position with obvious ecological advantages. For stablecoins, I choose $WLFI, considering both liquidity and risk comprehensively. In the exchange sector, $BNB is currently the leader, but honestly, I look forward to seeing new stars emerge in the exchange track — projects with real talent, complete teams, and a willingness to invest long-term.
The crypto market needs more potential new faces like this, not just trend-following projects chasing hot topics.