Market center divergence phenomenon occurs most commonly after the second center. This pattern is especially evident on daily charts and higher timeframes—data shows a probability of over 90%. Although the proportion is slightly lower on smaller timeframes like 1-minute charts, it still accounts for the majority. If divergence requires four or five centers to appear, that situation is already quite rare.
The most practical application of consolidation divergence is on larger timeframes, especially above the weekly chart, where it can often identify historic bottom zones.
From specific cases, a listed company’s quarterly chart shows a divergence segment targeting the last center on the monthly chart. This divergence segment must be contained within the quarterly divergence segment but is narrower in range. If this logic is extended layer by layer from the monthly to weekly, daily, 30-minute, 5-minute, and even 1-minute levels, each divergence zone shrinks, forming a complete multi-cycle resonance.
At least two centers of the same level are needed to form a trend. Divergence does not occur after the first center; it must appear after the second. For particularly extended markets, divergence may only occur after the 100th center—though such cases are extremely rare in a century. The second center on daily charts and above is a key monitoring target, as the occurrence rate of divergence is highest at this level and warrants close attention.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFTragedy
· 20h ago
How was the 90% figure calculated? Who measured it? Saying it so definitively feels a bit unreliable.
View OriginalReply0
zkProofInThePudding
· 21h ago
There's a 90% chance of divergence in the second core, this data is a bit outrageous. Is the real market really that predictable?
View OriginalReply0
CryptoComedian
· 01-08 00:59
Laughing and then crying, there's a 90% chance that the second central pivot will diverge, and this probability is even more certain than my stop-loss decision.
Wait, the divergence zones shrinking layer by layer from the monthly to the 1-minute chart— isn't this just a precise range for the little guys to get chopped up?
The 100th central pivot only diverges? That guy would have to live to 200 years old to make that kind of money. Might as well just lie flat.
Above the weekly chart is the true gentleman; the 1-minute chart is the devil. Everyone, try not to stare at that thing, your blood pressure will soar.
Multi-timeframe resonance sounds impressive, but in reality, it's just being surrounded on all sides with no escape (crying with laughter.jpg).
By the way, can you find the second central pivot? I already cut my losses at the first one.
View OriginalReply0
ZenZKPlayer
· 01-05 07:49
The probability of a double central divergence is so high, over 90% on the daily chart and above. Why didn't I catch the move?
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBroke
· 01-05 07:48
The divergence of the second middle pivot on the daily chart is really the golden rule, but the problem is that most people simply can't hold on to it.
View OriginalReply0
Degentleman
· 01-05 07:44
Damn, the second hub is about to be locked down, feels like it makes sense.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonk
· 01-05 07:40
A 90% probability sounds very appealing, but the ones who actually make money are never the ones relying on probability—they're relying on psychology.
I believe in the multi-cycle resonance logic, but the problem is that by the time someone reaches the second central hub, they've already been battered back and forth to death.
It's only at the hundredth central hub that divergence occurs... Bro, this isn't trading, this is cultivation.
You can identify the bottom, but you can't pass the psychological barrier of bottom-fishing. History repeating itself isn't about market trends; it's about human nature.
It's yet another perfect post-hoc analysis framework.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-0717ab66
· 01-05 07:39
The second core starts to look for divergence. I've used this logic before... there's indeed a 90% chance it works, which means that 10% will cause people to go bankrupt haha
View OriginalReply0
FUDwatcher
· 01-05 07:35
90% probability? Where does this data come from? Feels exaggerated.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullProphet
· 01-05 07:28
90% chance the second hub will diverge? Come on, why do I keep falling into traps?
Market center divergence phenomenon occurs most commonly after the second center. This pattern is especially evident on daily charts and higher timeframes—data shows a probability of over 90%. Although the proportion is slightly lower on smaller timeframes like 1-minute charts, it still accounts for the majority. If divergence requires four or five centers to appear, that situation is already quite rare.
The most practical application of consolidation divergence is on larger timeframes, especially above the weekly chart, where it can often identify historic bottom zones.
From specific cases, a listed company’s quarterly chart shows a divergence segment targeting the last center on the monthly chart. This divergence segment must be contained within the quarterly divergence segment but is narrower in range. If this logic is extended layer by layer from the monthly to weekly, daily, 30-minute, 5-minute, and even 1-minute levels, each divergence zone shrinks, forming a complete multi-cycle resonance.
At least two centers of the same level are needed to form a trend. Divergence does not occur after the first center; it must appear after the second. For particularly extended markets, divergence may only occur after the 100th center—though such cases are extremely rare in a century. The second center on daily charts and above is a key monitoring target, as the occurrence rate of divergence is highest at this level and warrants close attention.