How many people will miss out on gains during the critical window of a project airdrop? Looking back at last year's River project airdrop period, simple participation could earn tens of thousands of U-level returns, but at that time, very few participants followed up. Now, a similar mechanism has reappeared—TermMaxFi adopts the same points system design, allowing participants to accumulate points through social interactions and compete on an independent leaderboard. The operational logic of such project airdrops has been validated—low threshold, easy participation, transparent rewards. The core similarity is that both projects use a dual incentive model of points + leaderboard to encourage community activity, while clear airdrop quota allocation guarantees participants' expected returns. Those who experienced the previous round should see the value of this kind of airdrop window—so the question is, can you seize this opportunity this time?

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NotSatoshivip
· 01-06 12:07
Here we go again, those who didn't buy the dip in River's wave are probably still regretting it now.
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfastvip
· 01-05 09:10
Coming back with this set again? That round of River was really a huge profit, and a bunch of people around me regret it to death.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeLovervip
· 01-05 07:51
It's the same old trick. When River was around, some people really made a killing. Now it's TermMaxFi's turn... gotta hop on quickly. --- Points + leaderboard gameplay is definitely addictive, but I'm just worried about another wave of FOMO causing a sell-off. --- Honestly, it all depends on who reacts faster. The early participants should be having a great time now. --- The window period is just like that. If you miss it, it's really gone. Last time with River, I overslept, boohoo. --- Low barrier, high returns—sounds great, but how many can really keep earning consistently? --- Every time they talk about transparency and guaranteed expected returns, but in the end... just get on first and see. --- Alright, since I have nothing to do anyway, might as well give it a shot and see how much wool I can fleece.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHuntervip
· 01-05 07:47
Damn, another one? For those who missed the River move, don't miss out on TermMaxFi this time. --- The leaderboard is getting more and more competitive, but you can still earn by just participating blindly. That's not the issue. --- Friends who FOMOed last year should have realized by now. If you're still waiting this time, I don't believe it. --- Dual incentives? Sounds like a new trick to cut leeks, but the data is right there. --- The issue isn't whether you can grasp it, but whether you trust your own judgment. --- These kinds of things depend on who reacts quickly. The more social interaction, the more popular it is. It does take some time. --- Another low-threshold, high-reward scheme. Honestly, I'm a bit wary of these kinds of things. --- How many people have heard the River story? Most of the ones still debating are probably newbies.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseTradingGuruvip
· 01-05 07:44
It's that same narrative of "miss it and lose big" again... River's move did indeed catch some people, but talking about it as if it's an inevitable event is ironic. People who didn't join last time probably won't join this time either; it's just a matter of probability. TermMaxFi hasn't been verified yet, copying the mechanism won't guarantee returns? First, see how many people are in it.
View OriginalReply0
ETH_Maxi_Taxivip
· 01-05 07:40
It's the same old trick again. I really missed the wave of River this time. Now looking at TermMaxFi, it feels a bit suspicious. But is the model of points + leaderboards really that reliable? I'm still a bit skeptical. This time I must get on board no matter what; I can't miss out again, damn it. Can social interaction really boost earnings? That's pretty interesting.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperervip
· 01-05 07:38
It's the same old trick again. River's recent wave was indeed highly profitable, but the problem is that most people don't know about it or are too lazy to participate. TermMaxFi this time is really just copying River's formula. The points + leaderboard system has already been proven to be dead. Those who got in early are laughing last. If you want to catch this wave, you need to act quickly. Missing out will really make you regret it. It's the same window period, and the same people are still the ones making money. Honestly, it's just an information gap. Those who know have already been earning points. However, the leaderboard design can definitely make people get caught up in the hype, but only those who cash out truly count.
View OriginalReply0
LongTermDreamervip
· 01-05 07:37
It's the same mechanism again... I was part of the missed batch during that River round. Now looking at TermMaxFi, I still feel a bit scared. The lessons I should have learned three years ago are still being repeated.
View OriginalReply0
GasGoblinvip
· 01-05 07:34
Again? I really didn't react to that wave of River. Now that TermMaxFi has appeared, I'm a bit tempted to give it a try.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)