CBT prices often appear “calm” on charts, but comparing it with similar loyalty, reward, and business-oriented tokens can reveal clearer market signals regarding liquidity, supply transparency, and user adoption. According to the latest public market data, Community Business Token (CBT) is currently quoted at $0.0₆5496.
This article, from the perspective of Gate content creators, benchmarks CBT’s price against similar tokens in the same category and provides an objective interpretation of what these differences mean for traders and researchers interested in the cryptocurrency market.
CBT Today’s Price and Its Actual Implication
On the surface, the CBT price of $0.0₆5496 seems extremely low. However, price alone is insufficient for effective comparison. An important limitation is that CBT’s current circulating supply is not publicly available, making it impossible to rank or analyze based on market capitalization standards.
Therefore, CBT’s price is better interpreted through alternative metrics such as Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV), liquidity, and historical price performance. Currently, CBT’s FDV is approximately $38,474, calculated based on a total supply of 70 billion CBT.
This directly positions CBT within the micro-valuation category, even within the niche of loyalty tokens.
CBT Price Liquidity and Market Activity
Liquidity is the dominant factor influencing CBT’s price performance.
Current data shows that CBT’s 24-hour trading volume is nearly zero, indicating that there is effectively no active price discovery process. Specifically, this suggests:
Single trades may significantly impact the latest transaction price;
Bid-ask spreads may be large or nonexistent;
Short-term technical indicators have limited relevance.
Therefore, benchmarking CBT’s price against similar tokens can effectively prevent misjudging low prices as undervaluation.
CBT Price Data Brief
Based on current market data, CBT’s price can be summarized as follows:
CBT Price: $0.0₆5496
Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV): approximately $38,474
24-hour trading volume: close to zero
Circulating supply: not publicly displayed
Total supply: 70,000,000,000 CBT
Blockchain: Ethereum (ERC-20)
This fundamental data already shows that CBT differs significantly from more liquid loyalty or reward tokens.
Benchmark Comparison of CBT Price with Similar Loyalty and Business Tokens
To ensure a fair comparison, the benchmark group includes tokens focused on rewards, loyalty programs, or commercial applications, rather than infrastructure-based DeFi or Layer-1 projects.
Token
Price (USD)
Market Cap
24h Volume
Supply Transparency
Main Conclusion
CBT
$0.0₆5496
N/A
~$0
Circulating supply not shown
Liquidity is the biggest bottleneck
STMX
~$0.00005
~$55 ten thousand
~$26,000
Clear circulating and total supply
Small market cap but active trading
AVA (Travala)
~$0.28
~$1980 ten thousand
~$470 ten thousand
Fully transparent
Strong liquidity, healthy price discovery
BUY
~$0.0029
~$190 ten thousand
~$235,000
Transparent
More transparent valuation than CBT
NEXT
~$0.00072
~$53,000
~$3
Transparent
Low liquidity but higher than CBT
LOYAL
(Very low price)
Small market cap
~$83,000
Transparent
Significantly higher trading activity than CBT
Insights from Benchmarking CBT Price
1. Liquidity Gap Is Extremely Pronounced
Even among low-liquidity loyalty tokens, CBT’s daily trading activity is very minimal. Tokens like NEXT and BUY still have considerable daily volume, whereas CBT has almost none. This means CBT’s price more reflects the most recent trade rather than market consensus.
2. Lack of Supply Transparency Affects Valuation Confidence
Most comparable tokens publicly disclose circulating and total supply, facilitating cross-sectional market cap comparisons. CBT lacks circulating supply data and can only rely on FDV for valuation, reducing analysis accuracy.
3. CBT Price Is More “Static” Compared to Peers
Tokens like STMX and AVA benefit from active user engagement and exchange liquidity, leading to continuous price discovery. CBT, due to minimal trading, remains largely static.
Historical Context of CBT Price
Historical price ranges provide narrative context rather than direct trading signals:
All-time high: approximately $0.003999 (April 2021)
All-time low: approximately $0.0₇1994 (August 2021)
Given current liquidity conditions, these historical prices should be interpreted cautiously and not used as routine support or resistance levels.
Market Positioning of Community Business Token
Community Business Token is positioned as a blockchain-driven loyalty and reward solution, aiming to modernize traditional reward programs through tokenization, micro-payments, and lowered redemption barriers.
This positioning makes CBT more suitable for comparison with loyalty and reward tokens rather than DeFi yield or infrastructure projects. In this niche, user adoption and liquidity are often more critical than market narrative.
The Role of Gate in Benchmarking CBT Price
Even if a token’s activity is limited, Gate provides an effective benchmarking tool:
Traders can compare CBT’s price trends with more liquid, thematically similar tokens on Gate;
Analysts can understand CBT’s valuation environment by observing real trading volume loyalty tokens;
Gate’s broad market coverage helps distinguish between thematic performance and low activity of the token itself.
This comparative analysis is especially important for assets like CBT with extremely low liquidity.
Final Perspective on CBT Price
CBT’s price should be viewed more as a structural indicator shaped by low liquidity, opaque supply, and limited market participation rather than active trading signals.
Compared to similar loyalty and business tokens, CBT is clearly at an extreme low in liquidity. The most objective conclusion for Gate readers is that current CBT price analysis mainly relies on FDV, historical data, and benchmark comparisons, rather than traditional chart strategies.
Until liquidity and transparency improve, CBT’s price is better suited as a long-term informational reference rather than a basis for short-term trading decisions.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
CBT Price Comparison with Similar Tokens: Community Business Token Benchmark Analysis
This article, from the perspective of Gate content creators, benchmarks CBT’s price against similar tokens in the same category and provides an objective interpretation of what these differences mean for traders and researchers interested in the cryptocurrency market.
CBT Today’s Price and Its Actual Implication
On the surface, the CBT price of $0.0₆5496 seems extremely low. However, price alone is insufficient for effective comparison. An important limitation is that CBT’s current circulating supply is not publicly available, making it impossible to rank or analyze based on market capitalization standards.
Therefore, CBT’s price is better interpreted through alternative metrics such as Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV), liquidity, and historical price performance. Currently, CBT’s FDV is approximately $38,474, calculated based on a total supply of 70 billion CBT.
This directly positions CBT within the micro-valuation category, even within the niche of loyalty tokens.
CBT Price Liquidity and Market Activity
Liquidity is the dominant factor influencing CBT’s price performance. Current data shows that CBT’s 24-hour trading volume is nearly zero, indicating that there is effectively no active price discovery process. Specifically, this suggests:
Therefore, benchmarking CBT’s price against similar tokens can effectively prevent misjudging low prices as undervaluation.
CBT Price Data Brief
Based on current market data, CBT’s price can be summarized as follows:
This fundamental data already shows that CBT differs significantly from more liquid loyalty or reward tokens.
Benchmark Comparison of CBT Price with Similar Loyalty and Business Tokens
To ensure a fair comparison, the benchmark group includes tokens focused on rewards, loyalty programs, or commercial applications, rather than infrastructure-based DeFi or Layer-1 projects.
Insights from Benchmarking CBT Price
1. Liquidity Gap Is Extremely Pronounced Even among low-liquidity loyalty tokens, CBT’s daily trading activity is very minimal. Tokens like NEXT and BUY still have considerable daily volume, whereas CBT has almost none. This means CBT’s price more reflects the most recent trade rather than market consensus.
2. Lack of Supply Transparency Affects Valuation Confidence Most comparable tokens publicly disclose circulating and total supply, facilitating cross-sectional market cap comparisons. CBT lacks circulating supply data and can only rely on FDV for valuation, reducing analysis accuracy.
3. CBT Price Is More “Static” Compared to Peers Tokens like STMX and AVA benefit from active user engagement and exchange liquidity, leading to continuous price discovery. CBT, due to minimal trading, remains largely static.
Historical Context of CBT Price
Historical price ranges provide narrative context rather than direct trading signals:
Given current liquidity conditions, these historical prices should be interpreted cautiously and not used as routine support or resistance levels.
Market Positioning of Community Business Token
Community Business Token is positioned as a blockchain-driven loyalty and reward solution, aiming to modernize traditional reward programs through tokenization, micro-payments, and lowered redemption barriers.
This positioning makes CBT more suitable for comparison with loyalty and reward tokens rather than DeFi yield or infrastructure projects. In this niche, user adoption and liquidity are often more critical than market narrative.
The Role of Gate in Benchmarking CBT Price
Even if a token’s activity is limited, Gate provides an effective benchmarking tool:
This comparative analysis is especially important for assets like CBT with extremely low liquidity.
Final Perspective on CBT Price
CBT’s price should be viewed more as a structural indicator shaped by low liquidity, opaque supply, and limited market participation rather than active trading signals.
Compared to similar loyalty and business tokens, CBT is clearly at an extreme low in liquidity. The most objective conclusion for Gate readers is that current CBT price analysis mainly relies on FDV, historical data, and benchmark comparisons, rather than traditional chart strategies.
Until liquidity and transparency improve, CBT’s price is better suited as a long-term informational reference rather than a basis for short-term trading decisions.