A mysterious account that was registered only a few days ago placed a $30,000 bet on a political wager late Friday night. Twelve hours later, the account's funds skyrocketed to over $400,000, with a return of over 1200%.
This is not a fictional story, but a real transaction that took place on a well-known prediction market platform.
The contract regarding whether the leader would step down before the end of January saw its price jump from 5 cents to nearly $1 within a few hours. Trading volume once exceeded $120 million. And the most surreal part—this all happened before any official announcement.
The timeline is clear. On December 27, 2025, an account named "Burdensome-Mix" was opened. It remained low-profile for the following week until it suddenly became the largest player in the market's "bullish" position.
Over the last four days, the account invested a total of $32,537, all betting on a political event. Friday night was especially aggressive—just hours before the official announcement, a large number of newly registered anonymous accounts flooded the market, all targeting the same contract.
At that time, the market generally believed that the probability of U.S. intervention was only about 6%, so the contract was still cheap, costing only 5 to 7 cents. As a result, early Saturday morning, the official announcement confirmed the success of the operation. The contract price soared.
This incident sparked considerable discussion in the Web3 community—issues of information asymmetry in prediction markets, the possibility of insider trading, and the impact of such models on market fairness. To some extent, it also highlights the transparency advantages and risks inherent in on-chain transactions.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DeFiChef
· 20h ago
Wow, it's obvious someone got insider information
1200% returns, who would believe this isn't just someone who knew the news in advance
On-chain transparency is bullshit, the real big players are always ahead of retail investors
View OriginalReply0
SeeYouInFourYears
· 01-07 22:29
Wow, this move is really incredible, it feels like gambling on insider information.
Is the inability to detect insider trading an advantage or a disadvantage on the blockchain?
A few days' account gains of 1200% in 12 hours? I would have been frozen by the platform long ago.
Isn't this just information asymmetry eating retail investors? Predicting the market is starting to look more and more like a casino.
Burdensome-Mix, your moves are really bold. Just wonder who provided the intel.
View OriginalReply0
NotSatoshi
· 01-05 06:53
This is the difference between traditional finance and on-chain casinos—inside information can directly skyrocket to 1200%.
This guy must have known something in advance; sweeping from 5 cents to 1 dollar is just outrageous.
Prediction markets are like this—appear to be open and transparent, but the information gap is huge. People have been playing with black boxes there for a long time.
View OriginalReply0
AltcoinHunter
· 01-05 06:52
Damn, this is the hundredfold opportunity I was talking about, but I didn't get in...
It's fucking outrageous, a 6% chance to push the price up to $1, isn't this insider information?
This kind of thing is happening more and more, on-chain transparency is bullshit, whoever has the information eats the profits.
I bet $5 that next time it'll be the same way.
Did whales absorb the buy orders in the few minutes before the breakout? How come it's so coincidental?
By the way, did that account really only make over 400,000? If I had this insider info, I’d go all-in until bankruptcy.
Prediction markets are all about playing the information gap. Retail investors can analyze fundamentals all they want, but they’re just leeks.
Wait, is there a big-cap team behind this? A single account couldn’t produce this kind of movement alone.
I really regret not paying attention to prediction markets. Staring at meme projects in the crypto space is just useless.
This is why I say never underestimate the craziness on the chain. Next time I see such signals, I have to jump in.
View OriginalReply0
MonkeySeeMonkeyDo
· 01-05 06:37
1200% returns... You must have insider information to play like that.
On-chain transparency, my ass. They already knew the outcome.
This is a classic case of information asymmetry. While we retail investors are still guessing, they've already won the bet.
What happened to decentralization? Insider information is still everywhere.
A mysterious account that was registered only a few days ago placed a $30,000 bet on a political wager late Friday night. Twelve hours later, the account's funds skyrocketed to over $400,000, with a return of over 1200%.
This is not a fictional story, but a real transaction that took place on a well-known prediction market platform.
The contract regarding whether the leader would step down before the end of January saw its price jump from 5 cents to nearly $1 within a few hours. Trading volume once exceeded $120 million. And the most surreal part—this all happened before any official announcement.
The timeline is clear. On December 27, 2025, an account named "Burdensome-Mix" was opened. It remained low-profile for the following week until it suddenly became the largest player in the market's "bullish" position.
Over the last four days, the account invested a total of $32,537, all betting on a political event. Friday night was especially aggressive—just hours before the official announcement, a large number of newly registered anonymous accounts flooded the market, all targeting the same contract.
At that time, the market generally believed that the probability of U.S. intervention was only about 6%, so the contract was still cheap, costing only 5 to 7 cents. As a result, early Saturday morning, the official announcement confirmed the success of the operation. The contract price soared.
This incident sparked considerable discussion in the Web3 community—issues of information asymmetry in prediction markets, the possibility of insider trading, and the impact of such models on market fairness. To some extent, it also highlights the transparency advantages and risks inherent in on-chain transactions.