The Aave ecosystem recently experienced a turning point in its governance turmoil. Project founder Stani recently published an article titled "How Aave Will Win" on the Aave governance forum, partially addressing the controversy that previously sparked heated community discussions.



The core issue of this turmoil points to a well-known topic: alignment of interests. In Stani's view, there is a structural bias between protocol development and the return expectations of token holders. Notably, he explicitly stated in the article his willingness to share off-protocol income with AAVE holders and plans to submit an official governance proposal to advance this commitment.

This change in attitude has been seen by many community members as a positive outcome—at least providing a basis for dialogue regarding the interests of both parties. Of course, this governance drama is far from over; the specific content of subsequent proposals and the voting results are the real highlights. As a leading DeFi lending protocol, every step in Aave's governance direction is closely watched by the industry.
AAVE-0,54%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ImaginaryWhalevip
· 01-08 04:37
Basically, Stani was cornered, and only then did he remember the feelings of token holders. External income from the sharing protocol? Let's wait until the proposal is implemented; verbal promises are only worth a few coins in this circle. This wave of Aave's turmoil is quite interesting. It seems that even top protocols have to bow to the community. The real test is still that governance proposal; how the specific terms are set is the key. Aligning interests has been talked about for so many years, but it only becomes serious when there's no other choice.
View OriginalReply0
ForumMiningMastervip
· 01-07 20:29
Basically, it's still a matter of unclear profit distribution. Now that Stani has apologized and is willing to share external protocol revenue, I just want to see how the proposal is written. Hopefully, it's not just empty talk.
View OriginalReply0
P2ENotWorkingvip
· 01-05 06:54
Stani finally compromised, off-chain income from the sharing protocol... sounds good, but the proposal content is the real game-changer. Let's see the results of the vote then.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainFriesvip
· 01-05 06:54
Wait, Stani just now remembers to share external income with the holders? After all these years, only now admitting fault?
View OriginalReply0
WagmiAnonvip
· 01-05 06:45
Stani backed down and agreed to share the protocol's external revenue, but how much can be distributed really depends on how the proposal is written... I've seen this trick many times before, first make a promise and then see.
View OriginalReply0
HodlAndChillvip
· 01-05 06:28
Alright, alright, it's the old trick of aligning interests again. Stani suddenly wants to share revenue? I think he's just being pushed by the community, nothing else.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt