Looking at the recent BTC trend, it has been mostly following the rhythm of the main players. Every time it reaches a critical point, the main players will defend the price nearby, which is no coincidence.
Using data-driven analysis tools to calculate these key levels is indeed useful—by tracking capital flows, we can identify where the main players are truly investing heavily to push the price up. More importantly, if there is clear capital support during pullbacks, it indicates that the defending force is present. This logic has been repeatedly validated in recent market conditions.
To catch the rhythm of this wave, instead of guessing based on candlestick patterns, it’s better to focus on the capital aspect—main players’ chip distribution and defensive strength are often more honest than the price itself.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FUD_Whisperer
· 4h ago
Market support? Basically, it's just the main players laying the groundwork before cutting the leeks.
Funding is indeed important, but those tracking tools are only armchair strategists; when a real crash happens, no one can escape.
Better to earn a little less than to be fooled by the main players' fake support. Lesson learned.
The "honesty" of the main players might be even better at lying than you.
Anyway, I still trust my instincts more; these data can all be faked.
View OriginalReply0
LeverageAddict
· 01-06 09:28
Fundamentals are the real truth; those who focus on K-line charts are just naive investors with a rookie mentality.
When signs of main force supporting the market appear, it's time to jump in. My bottom fishing this time is based on observing the strength of support.
Simply put, follow the money and don't waste energy fighting the price.
Chip distribution is clear at a glance. Why guess?
I've tested this logic for a long time, and it really helps to catch the rhythm.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c802f0e8
· 01-05 06:50
Looking at the capital flow is indeed more reliable than watching K-line charts; recent attempts to support the market have all been confirmed.
The distribution of main force chips is spot on; it's much more honest than the price itself.
By the way, how accurate is your tracking tool? It feels like you can always catch the bottom?
The threshold for measuring support strength is too high; retail investors find it hard to grasp.
I always miss the obvious moments when capital absorption is clear; my sense of rhythm is really off.
View OriginalReply0
ApyWhisperer
· 01-05 06:42
Bro, this analysis actually has some substance. The funding situation is indeed much more honest than the K-line.
I just want to ask, what if the support power suddenly withdraws?
The logic at the key levels is indeed valid, but those who truly make money are the ones who see through this game.
That's right, the chip distribution can reveal the true intentions of the main force.
Instead of studying the support, it's better to first figure out where your stop-loss is.
Funding reception must be monitored at all times; a slight lapse can get you trapped.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonk
· 01-05 06:39
Trying to stabilize the market sounds nice, but honestly, it's just the main players pretending when they're cutting the leeks.
This logic sounds clear, but I feel like it's the same old story... Is tracking capital flow really reliable?
They're starting to hype up capital flow again. Every time I hear this, I get cut so quickly.
I just want to know where you got this data tool from. Is it really that accurate?
So, all the key support levels are just the main players? Then retail investors deserve to be cut.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterZhang
· 01-05 06:33
Hmm, this approach to the funding side is indeed much more reliable than just watching the charts. I've been operating this way recently as well.
Main force support, once you see it enough, you can feel it. When capital absorption starts, things are basically stable.
That's right, compared to studying candlestick patterns, it's more important to see where the money is flowing. That's the real truth.
The strength of support really speaks louder than price. I didn't pay much attention to it before, but looking back now, I understand.
The things on the funding side really don't lie; it all depends on whether you can react in time.
I've been using this logic for a few months, and my win rate has definitely increased a lot. But the key still depends on execution.
In one sentence, to follow the main force's rhythm, you must focus on the capital; watching K-line patterns is just gambling.
Looking at the recent BTC trend, it has been mostly following the rhythm of the main players. Every time it reaches a critical point, the main players will defend the price nearby, which is no coincidence.
Using data-driven analysis tools to calculate these key levels is indeed useful—by tracking capital flows, we can identify where the main players are truly investing heavily to push the price up. More importantly, if there is clear capital support during pullbacks, it indicates that the defending force is present. This logic has been repeatedly validated in recent market conditions.
To catch the rhythm of this wave, instead of guessing based on candlestick patterns, it’s better to focus on the capital aspect—main players’ chip distribution and defensive strength are often more honest than the price itself.