2026-01-05 00:30:35

#数字资产动态追踪 In 2026, cryptocurrencies officially entered the mainstream financial world.

What about the US? The SEC's tone has changed—shifting from full enforcement to emphasizing compliance, and they are still pushing the Project Crypto plan, aiming to test RWA (Real Asset Tokenization) in a regulated environment. The EU is not idle either; the MiCA regulation has officially been implemented, requiring all service providers to obtain licenses. While the threshold has been raised, you know what? This has actually attracted a large influx of institutional funds—because they are comfortable with this standardized approach.

Even more interesting are the actions at the national level. Fidelity's report shows that more and more countries are planning to include Bitcoin in their national reserve assets. Think about how much this could support $BTC in the long term. From regulatory crackdowns to institutional acceptance, 2026 is considered a watershed year for the crypto market.

BTC-2,15%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

WagmiWarrior

· 01-07 12:25

Damn, SEC's shift is quite aggressive. They were still aggressively cracking down before, and now they're rolling out the red carpet? BTC being included in the national reserves—if that really happens, I'm jumping on the bandwagon and not getting off. Institutional funds entering the market mean retail investors should probably run, right? That whole MiCA framework looks regulated on the surface, but in reality, it's just paving the way for big whales. From suppression to acceptance—sounds nice, but isn't it just capital harvesting retail investors? Is 2026 really a watershed moment? I feel like this is just a cyclical harvesting point. This recent surge has brought in so much real money—how can institutions miss out on this fat profit? SEC changing its tone—what does that mean? Someone's probably about to lose their head, right?

View OriginalReply0

FUDwatcher

· 01-07 03:38

Wow, SEC's turnaround speed, I have to say, good grief... Went from a dump trader to a guide, I really didn't see that coming. The national-level HODL is happening, BTC is about to skyrocket. Once MiCA was announced, it actually pushed institutions to come in; I haven't seen this script before.

View OriginalReply0

RektRecorder

· 01-05 02:16

Damn, it's really happening now. Regulation has shifted from crashing the market to rolling out the red carpet. Institutions have been waiting for this opportunity. Standardization is their cash cow. Bitcoin entering reserves? If that really happens, retail investors' chips will be the real gold.

View OriginalReply0

MidsommarWallet

· 01-05 00:59

Haha, finally waited for this day. It feels like BTC is about to take off.

View OriginalReply0

LiquiditySurfer

· 01-05 00:57

The signals for institutional entry are so obvious, what are we still waiting for? --- The SEC's attitude turning is really a turning point; compliance has become the ticket to entry. --- Including BTC in national reserves? If that really happens, how many times will the coin's price increase? --- The high thresholds of MiCA ironically attract institutions to come in, isn't that ironic? --- From suppression to acceptance, this speed of change is incredible. --- RWA testing the waters within the regulatory framework, this is truly the beginning of mainstream adoption. --- The data in the Fidelity report shows that major institutions have already started to deploy. --- The 2026 watershed is indeed no joke; it feels like the entire track's vibe has changed. --- Regulatory standardization = institutions feel safe to enter, a logical consistency. --- Countries are competing to add BTC reserves; is this really happening or just hype?

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseLandlord

· 01-05 00:56

Hey, the SEC's shift is indeed a bit sudden; it feels like the wind has completely changed direction. If BTC is truly included in the national reserves, that would completely rewrite the rules of the game, it's hard to imagine. Although the path to compliance is challenging, institutional funds are really following this trend, indicating the overall direction of the market. The 2026 watershed marks, it feels like we are indeed standing at a historical turning point. RWA testing the waters seems to be the main event; Bitcoin is just the appetizer, right?

View OriginalReply0

ShamedApeSeller

· 01-05 00:41

To be honest, SEC's recent shift is truly remarkable. From the crazy crackdown a few years ago to now being compliant and friendly, I didn't see this turning point coming. RWA definitely has potential; once the regulatory framework is clear, institutional funds will flock in. The national-level reserves are even more exciting. Bitcoin transforming from a wild asset to a "national asset" is the real game changer. 2026 is really a watershed moment that can't be missed. But on the other hand, will regulation end up cutting off some people's dreams of getting rich? What's your take on this?

View OriginalReply0

FrogInTheWell

· 01-05 00:35

It sounds like the SEC has really changed its tune, going from hunter to referee. This shift is quite significant. The national team entering the market with Bitcoin reserves is the real ultimate signal. Institutions have already caught on. The EU's compliance framework looks strict, but it attracts institutions to come in. It shows that the rules themselves are a sieve, filtering out retail investors and bringing in real money. This wave from regulatory suppression to mainstream acceptance is indeed a watershed moment, but don't celebrate too early. The market always has its ups and downs.

View OriginalReply0