2026-01-05 00:23:35

Recently, discussions about projects like $ZBT, $ZKC, and $PLAY have been heard across various circles. From stock market groups to different social platforms, the popularity of these tokens has indeed attracted a lot of attention. Interestingly, this kind of cross-community dissemination phenomenon is not common in the crypto market—usually only top assets like Bitcoin can garner such widespread discussion.

What does this indicate? It may suggest that market expectations for these projects have increased. When a token can break out of its information cocoon and spark heated discussions among non-professionals, it often means it has gained certain market momentum. Of course, investors should remain rational—hype and actual value are two different things. However, based on market phenomena, this wave of attention is worth monitoring.

ZBT-1,31%

ZKC-1,13%

BTC-0,91%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MondayYoloFridayCry

· 4h ago

It's the same old story, heat = potential energy? Just a signal before a pump, I bet five bucks that no one will mention it next week.

View OriginalReply0

TrustMeBro

· 01-05 04:59

Popularity is popularity, but I still have to look at the fundamentals... Can the tokenomics of these coins really hold up?

View OriginalReply0

BitcoinDaddy

· 01-05 00:53

Popularity does not equal fundamentals. I think this wave is mainly retail investors banding together to speculate. We'll know once big funds come in.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedNotStirred

· 01-05 00:52

The buzz has indeed increased, but to be honest, I care more about the real data of these projects rather than the hype in the chat groups. When was the last time we saw such cross-community promotion?

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiHeir

· 01-05 00:52

It should be pointed out that this kind of information fission phenomenon is completely traceable in on-chain data — popularity ≠ fundamentals, which is a paradox I argued in 2015. @ZBTs can break out of the circle for only two reasons: either the technical core has truly made a breakthrough, or it is purely a narrative carnival. I lean towards the latter, but I am willing to be falsified by on-chain data. --- Laughing, another wave of "cross-circle popularity equals justice" rhetoric. Returning to the original thinking of the white paper, market momentum and Ponzi dynamics are often just one chart apart. --- Undoubtedly, the participation of non-professionals precisely indicates that the risk threshold has been reached. This is not a good sign, everyone. --- Interesting, the market phenomenology is beginning to indulge in self-appreciation again. Technological revolutions never require the approval of stock market groups. --- According to the white paper and on-chain data, the essence of this discussion is liquidity chasing, not value consensus. The difference is significant.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketGardener

· 01-05 00:23

There's a lot of hype involved. I'm still on the sidelines, waiting to see if there's any substantial progress before making a move.

View OriginalReply0