I'm convinced that programmatic protections work better than traditional approaches. Here's the thing—we build around the principle that code creates certainty when institutions can't.
But here's what people miss: "ownership" isn't fixed. It's not a guarantee stamped in stone. It's an interpretation that shifts with pressure, regulation, and whoever holds power at the moment. What you truly own is what the system can't arbitrarily take away—and that's where executable code becomes your actual shield, not paperwork.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CompoundPersonality
· 01-07 09:28
Code is the real shield; no matter how much paper you have, it's useless.
View OriginalReply0
On-ChainDiver
· 01-07 07:41
Code is law, paper is a joke
View OriginalReply0
RunWithRugs
· 01-04 23:54
Code is truth, paper is all nonsense
View OriginalReply0
CrossChainBreather
· 01-04 23:39
To put it simply, code is the strongest shield; paper-based property rights can turn hostile at any time.
View OriginalReply0
ChainChef
· 01-04 23:32
ngl the "ownership is just vibes" take hits different when you realize it's basically been simmering in regulatory soup this whole time. code as your real sous chef > any legal paperwork honestly
I'm convinced that programmatic protections work better than traditional approaches. Here's the thing—we build around the principle that code creates certainty when institutions can't.
But here's what people miss: "ownership" isn't fixed. It's not a guarantee stamped in stone. It's an interpretation that shifts with pressure, regulation, and whoever holds power at the moment. What you truly own is what the system can't arbitrarily take away—and that's where executable code becomes your actual shield, not paperwork.