2026-01-04 23:25:59

Content monetization and traffic-driven strategies indeed have significant conflicts. If creators focus solely on how much buzz they can attract with each post while neglecting the quality and value of the content itself, such an approach can feel out of place on platforms like Twitter. To be honest, even the generous incentives offered by Twitter can't compare to the income volume of live-streaming sales hosts. Instead of wasting effort chasing traffic on Twitter, it might be better to turn to Xiaohongshu or Douyin—platforms with clearer monetization paths and faster traffic conversion rates. The key is to clarify your positioning: do you truly want to create content, or are you just trying to make quick money?

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DaoTherapy

· 01-05 16:06

In the era where traffic is king, some still care about the truly scarce content quality. But honestly, relying on text to make money on Twitter is really exhausting; it all depends on the platform's rules of the game. The efficiency of making money through selling products indeed surpasses all ideals. When it comes to creating content or monetizing, it depends on your original intention—don't let motivation hijack you. That little money on Twitter can't compare to the daily average of live streaming rooms; you know this without even calculating. The key is not to deceive yourself—think clearly: is it genuine creation or just a desire to get rich? Content supremacy is just something to listen to; the market is the ultimate battleground.

View OriginalReply0

WenMoon

· 01-04 23:29

Twitter is originally a place to view content; the approach of prioritizing traffic has long been worn out.

View OriginalReply0