Although Ethereum has shown impressive innovation in blockchain technology, its open and anonymous nature also provides opportunities for malicious actors. The data is clear: by the first half of last year, the total losses from ICO fraud and online scams reached $225 million, and the amounts involved in those abnormal transactions throughout 2022 are even more staggering—$23.8 billion.
How to fill such a huge black hole? Traditional manual annotation methods are no longer sufficient; data labeling is limited, costly, and difficult to scale. Fortunately, breakthroughs in unsupervised machine learning technology in recent years have brought new ideas to transaction risk detection.
**Where to start? First, organize the data** The first step in abnormal transaction detection is to structure the massive transaction data of Ethereum. Pull historical transaction records from on-chain data sources, then construct a weighted multi-transaction network. Simply put, the nodes in the graph represent accounts, edges represent transaction flows, and weights are determined by transaction amounts and timestamps. The advantage of this design is that it can reveal both the relationships between accounts and the spatiotemporal features of transactions. For example, high-frequency large transactions may indicate a Ponzi scheme, while dispersed small transactions could involve dust attacks.
**Then, use dual graph transformation to extract deep features** In the original transaction network, transaction relationships are often obscure. Researchers came up with the idea of dual graph transformation: treat each transaction itself as an independent node and establish connections between transactions sharing accounts. With this transformation, the indirect relationships between transactions become explicit, allowing the discovery of many previously unseen chains of relationships.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-a5fa8bd0
· 15h ago
The figure of $23.8 billion is truly astonishing. It feels like scams are outpacing innovation.
View OriginalReply0
NoodlesOrTokens
· 18h ago
23.8 billion black holes are truly incredible. Even with machine learning to save the day, it still takes time.
The dust attack methods have been seen before; the key is how the transaction chain is connected.
Can machine learning withstand this pressure? It feels like just the beginning.
The idea of dual graphs sounds impressive, but the real effectiveness depends on implementation.
Ponzi schemes keep coming up with new tricks; algorithms need to be updated constantly.
View OriginalReply0
AirDropMissed
· 01-04 23:52
$23.8 billion black hole, this scale is truly incredible... but it seems AI detection also can't guarantee 100% foolproof.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoFortuneTeller
· 01-04 23:52
$23.8 billion? With this number, DeFi is really a black hole... Luckily, machine learning is here to put out the fire.
View OriginalReply0
MissedAirdropAgain
· 01-04 23:52
23.8 billion USD... Oh my god, this number is mind-blowing.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhobia
· 01-04 23:48
23.8 billion, huh? This black hole is really deep, a bit outrageous... Can machine learning really catch these scammers? I feel like some still slip through the cracks.
Although Ethereum has shown impressive innovation in blockchain technology, its open and anonymous nature also provides opportunities for malicious actors. The data is clear: by the first half of last year, the total losses from ICO fraud and online scams reached $225 million, and the amounts involved in those abnormal transactions throughout 2022 are even more staggering—$23.8 billion.
How to fill such a huge black hole? Traditional manual annotation methods are no longer sufficient; data labeling is limited, costly, and difficult to scale. Fortunately, breakthroughs in unsupervised machine learning technology in recent years have brought new ideas to transaction risk detection.
**Where to start? First, organize the data**
The first step in abnormal transaction detection is to structure the massive transaction data of Ethereum. Pull historical transaction records from on-chain data sources, then construct a weighted multi-transaction network. Simply put, the nodes in the graph represent accounts, edges represent transaction flows, and weights are determined by transaction amounts and timestamps. The advantage of this design is that it can reveal both the relationships between accounts and the spatiotemporal features of transactions. For example, high-frequency large transactions may indicate a Ponzi scheme, while dispersed small transactions could involve dust attacks.
**Then, use dual graph transformation to extract deep features**
In the original transaction network, transaction relationships are often obscure. Researchers came up with the idea of dual graph transformation: treat each transaction itself as an independent node and establish connections between transactions sharing accounts. With this transformation, the indirect relationships between transactions become explicit, allowing the discovery of many previously unseen chains of relationships.