Chevron's presence in Venezuela wasn't a choice based on favorable terms—the company accepted unfavorable JV arrangements from the mid-2000s PDVSA era precisely because competitors had already exited. Staying in a hostile policy environment doesn't translate to comfortable operations.
Here's the timing problem nobody discusses: the Trump administration has roughly three years to reshape energy geopolitics. But Venezuela oil projects operate on decade-plus timelines—exploration, infrastructure buildout, production ramp-up. Policy windows and resource cycles don't align.
You can't force a 30-year project into a 3-year political mandate. Geography and geology move slower than Washington.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SillyWhale
· 01-07 11:41
To be honest, political cycles and geological cycles are not even in the same league. Washington always wants to play fast chess, but the oil fields don't cooperate.
View OriginalReply0
just_another_fish
· 01-04 21:57
The policy window doesn't align with the geological cycle, that's the reality... No matter how rich Washington's imagination is, it can't change the fact that oil wells take more than a decade to start producing oil.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeLover
· 01-04 21:55
Geological cycles are fundamentally not on the same level as political cycles... Chevron has already been held up for a long time.
View OriginalReply0
PebbleHander
· 01-04 21:46
Political cycles and geological cycles are completely different matters. Washington folks always want to cut through the Gordian knot quickly...
View OriginalReply0
NeonCollector
· 01-04 21:39
The pace of geology and political science will never match, and that's the real dilemma.
Chevron's presence in Venezuela wasn't a choice based on favorable terms—the company accepted unfavorable JV arrangements from the mid-2000s PDVSA era precisely because competitors had already exited. Staying in a hostile policy environment doesn't translate to comfortable operations.
Here's the timing problem nobody discusses: the Trump administration has roughly three years to reshape energy geopolitics. But Venezuela oil projects operate on decade-plus timelines—exploration, infrastructure buildout, production ramp-up. Policy windows and resource cycles don't align.
You can't force a 30-year project into a 3-year political mandate. Geography and geology move slower than Washington.