$MINI actually holds the distinction of being the first CTO in this space, launched on May 2nd. However, $MEGA came onto the scene later, receiving its CTO on May 22nd. The timeline reveals an interesting dynamic in how these tokens achieved their milestones during that period. Understanding this chronological order matters for anyone tracking the development of these projects and the broader trends they represent in the market.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeDodger
· 16h ago
NGL Mini's proactive move this time is okay, but Mega's later comeback momentum is also quite impressive.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-40edb63b
· 01-04 20:55
NGL Mini is somewhat proactive, but Mega's comeback speed is also quite impressive. They achieved it in just twenty days.
View OriginalReply0
rugged_again
· 01-04 20:54
Nah Mini's early move is really decisive, but Mega has a greater chance of coming from behind...
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHero
· 01-04 20:44
Nah $MINI really took the lead, but the momentum of $MEGA catching up cannot be ignored... Both projects seem to be competing fiercely.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetective
· 01-04 20:30
Oh wow, $MINI is actually the first to take the plunge. This pace is pretty good.
$MINI actually holds the distinction of being the first CTO in this space, launched on May 2nd. However, $MEGA came onto the scene later, receiving its CTO on May 22nd. The timeline reveals an interesting dynamic in how these tokens achieved their milestones during that period. Understanding this chronological order matters for anyone tracking the development of these projects and the broader trends they represent in the market.