There's an interesting pattern emerging in how top venture firms scout for founders. It's not always about the Ivy League credentials or the perfectly polished pitch deck. Some of the most successful VCs are gravitating toward founders who've weathered real hardship—the kind that builds mental toughness and unconventional problem-solving.



Why? Because adversity often creates founders who refuse to quit. They've already overcome significant obstacles before they ever launched their startup. They understand scarcity, resilience, and the grit needed to survive market downturns.

This shift challenges the traditional narrative. The narrative that said you need the "right" background, connections, and smooth upbringing to build a billion-dollar company. Instead, what VCs are increasingly recognizing is that founders with difficult personal histories often bring something institutional backgrounds can't buy: genuine grit and authentic problem-solving born from necessity.

It's worth asking: does this signal a real change in how the startup ecosystem evaluates potential, or is it just the latest trend in founder mythology? Either way, it's reshaping who gets funded and why.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MeltdownSurvivalistvip
· 46m ago
Nah, this way of saying it sounds good, but it's still those wealthy people patting themselves on the back... The actual proportion of people with no background who get funding is still shockingly low.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaBrainvip
· 7h ago
NGL, this set of logic sounds pretty good, but I still have some doubts... Do they really seriously consider founders who come from hardship backgrounds? Or do they just talk about it? After blowing "prestigious school background + connections" for so many years, has it really changed? I don't think so. People love to make up stories, and hardship narratives are so popular right now... In two years, it will probably be the next trending story. This is actually the opposite. Compared to background, VCs actually care most about ROI. Don't be fooled by the marketing copy. Actually, thinking about it, people who have truly endured hardships are indeed different... I've seen too many rough and ready types who have been through a lot.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingersPapervip
· 01-04 20:29
Basically, VCs are now starting to play the "suffering narrative"... But I just want to ask, do VCs really still fund these story-driven founders during fundraising?
View OriginalReply0
CexIsBadvip
· 01-04 20:21
Basically, VC is now starting to promote the "suffering narrative." Wasn't it all about Ivy League+ connections before? Now they're just pretending to value grit... Do you believe it?
View OriginalReply0
SatsStackingvip
· 01-04 20:14
ngl, this is just nonsense. The truly wealthy VCs still invest in those with prestigious university backgrounds... There are many founders who have endured hardships, but the number of funding rounds remains uncertain.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)