This project appears glamorous on the surface, but it's full of pitfalls behind the scenes. Once involved, it's a hassle—getting stuck for three or five days in the short term, losing at least two thousand dollars in the account, and having to rely on multiple technical indicators repeatedly to cut losses. Those who have truly been involved know that the fundamentals of such projects have multiple flaws, with risks piling up like mountains. I advise retail investors not to touch it; trying to "cure" this "disease" is too costly.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ApeShotFirst
· 4h ago
Damn, it's another scam project. I almost fell for it.
View OriginalReply0
FloorPriceNightmare
· 01-04 19:52
Another thing that cuts the leeks, it should have been made clear long ago.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullSurvivor
· 01-04 19:48
I've heard too many of these nonsense stories and have become numb to them already haha
View OriginalReply0
liquiditea_sipper
· 01-04 19:44
I already said this stuff is too risky; once you're in, it's just karma for getting cut.
View OriginalReply0
liquidation_surfer
· 01-04 19:35
I don't even want to say it anymore, really, this kind of market should have been recognized long ago, entering is just sending money
This project appears glamorous on the surface, but it's full of pitfalls behind the scenes. Once involved, it's a hassle—getting stuck for three or five days in the short term, losing at least two thousand dollars in the account, and having to rely on multiple technical indicators repeatedly to cut losses. Those who have truly been involved know that the fundamentals of such projects have multiple flaws, with risks piling up like mountains. I advise retail investors not to touch it; trying to "cure" this "disease" is too costly.