Recently, the market narrative surrounding a certain prominent figure has sparked quite a bit of discussion. Such topics can indeed boost community enthusiasm. However, what truly deserves attention is the project's underlying economic design.
Taking $SHIB as an example, the dual mechanism of dividends and token burning is quite straightforward—the distribution of dividends is always accompanied by token burning. This directly impacts the supply side, and from an economic perspective, it can enhance the token's scarcity. The burned tokens permanently exit circulation, effectively locking in value for holders.
From a bottom-up perspective, the current price is indeed relatively low. For participants optimistic about this direction, this is a noteworthy opportunity. Community building and continuous optimization of the economic model often have a greater influence on long-term trends than short-term market sentiment. Those interested can study the details of this mechanism and then decide whether to participate in its development.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Fren_Not_Food
· 20h ago
The destruction mechanism sounds good, but the key is whether it can actually be implemented properly. Or is it just another PPT promise haha
View OriginalReply0
ShamedApeSeller
· 01-05 01:48
The destruction mechanism sounds good, but whether it really works depends on whether the community is willing to hold.
View OriginalReply0
MemeTokenGenius
· 01-04 19:50
To be honest, the narrative approach centered on characters is already outdated; you still need to focus on the economic model to make money.
The dual-track system of destruction + dividends is indeed ruthless, and the permanent lock-in of supply is brilliant—holders are making a killing.
The current price is at the bottom, but the key is whether the community can hold on. Even with a good economic design, someone still needs to take the bait.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeWhisperer
· 01-04 19:50
The destruction mechanism is okay, but can dividends really boost the market... Honestly, that's a bit optimistic.
It's better to see if the token can truly become scarce rather than just listening to stories, that's the key.
It's indeed at a low level now, but lows can continue to go lower haha, still depends on whether the fundamentals can hold up.
View OriginalReply0
shadowy_supercoder
· 01-04 19:50
The destruction mechanism sounds good, but whether it can truly boost the market depends on the community's enthusiasm.
View OriginalReply0
PancakeFlippa
· 01-04 19:49
The destruction mechanism sounds good, but ultimately, whether the price can be sustained depends on the community's strength.
View OriginalReply0
ForkThisDAO
· 01-04 19:46
The destruction mechanism really convinced me, but as for SHIB... whether you believe it or not, I definitely do.
Recently, the market narrative surrounding a certain prominent figure has sparked quite a bit of discussion. Such topics can indeed boost community enthusiasm. However, what truly deserves attention is the project's underlying economic design.
Taking $SHIB as an example, the dual mechanism of dividends and token burning is quite straightforward—the distribution of dividends is always accompanied by token burning. This directly impacts the supply side, and from an economic perspective, it can enhance the token's scarcity. The burned tokens permanently exit circulation, effectively locking in value for holders.
From a bottom-up perspective, the current price is indeed relatively low. For participants optimistic about this direction, this is a noteworthy opportunity. Community building and continuous optimization of the economic model often have a greater influence on long-term trends than short-term market sentiment. Those interested can study the details of this mechanism and then decide whether to participate in its development.