2026-01-04 17:28:04

Rainbow Fish project status scan: 220 holders, only 1.3% of supply locked. What is hidden behind this data combination? Based on the current market pricing, either the fundamentals of this project are seriously undervalued, or there is an issue with the price itself. With such a small number of holders and insufficient liquidity locking, there are quite a few projects like this within the Solana ecosystem. To double the number or even more, what does it depend on—community enthusiasm, on-chain activity, or pure market sentiment? Does the current price reflect true value or the market's collective confusion?

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DegenApeSurfer

· 01-05 16:49

220 holders? This is basically a casino, 1.3% lockup is outrageous --- There are so many projects like this on Solana, but only a few dare to take over --- The price probably reflects the last frenzy before the rug pull, I think --- Is underestimating still a problem? Possibly, it all depends on who is still throwing money in --- With such poor liquidity, want to double your money? You have to rely on marketing to cut the leeks, otherwise how to play --- Isn't this just a gambler's playground? The consensus of 220 people is worth nothing --- If you ask me, this kind of project is probably a cash machine for certain people, its actual value has long been zero --- Community hype? All bots, real people have long since left --- Honestly, only reckless fools still dare to touch these kinds of projects

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractDiver

· 01-04 17:58

Only 1.3% of 220 holders are locked? Isn't this just a setup by a big whale controlling the market? There are many projects like Solana; you have to wait for the right moment to take off. Is this price undervalued or overvalued? Who can say for sure? It's purely a gamble on market sentiment; fundamentals don't hold much weight in the crypto world.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainArchaeologist

· 01-04 17:58

220 holders? Isn't this just a game of chips? Underestimated or just cutting leeks, anyway I choose to wait and see. There are many projects like Solana, the next one won't be better. Price is just collective gambling, don't be fooled by fundamentals. Lock-up is only 1.3%, how unconfident is that? Community buzz? Come on, it still depends on whether the whales want to pump. The true value has already been discovered, now it's just a matter of who will take over. Let's wait and see, maybe it's a sign of the next explosion or project failure.

View OriginalReply0

Frontrunner

· 01-04 17:44

Are 220 people holding? This is just a casino, and the liquidity is so low... Another typical pump-and-dump scheme on Solana, right? Is it underestimated or is there a problem? Honestly, no one can figure it out. Wait, could this thing have no real value at all? Can community enthusiasm save it? It seems very unlikely. Is it just market sentiment driving the hype? Then get ready to be trapped. 1.3% locked... That's outrageous, who would dare to buy in? Is the price real? I don't think it's very genuine. Another shitcoin project, next one please. With so few holders, what does that mean? Nobody trusts it.

View OriginalReply0

DAOTruant

· 01-04 17:31

220 holders? What does this data indicate? There are too few gamblers. Liquidity is only locked at 1.3%, isn't that a landmine? The price is undervalued or there's a problem; anyway, I can't see through it. There are so many small projects like Solana that it's overwhelming, relying solely on stubbornness. It feels like everyone is fooling themselves.

View OriginalReply0