2026-01-04 14:32:11

Although the hype around the yield farming track has decreased, it still remains one of the lowest-cost ways to earn profits. The key lies in whether you can accurately select the right projects.

Currently, the truly worthwhile opportunities to participate in have become fewer, which instead provides more space for observation and research. Rather than participating blindly, it's better to spend time systematically screening—look at the funding background, team resumes, community activity, and analyze each one carefully.

Patience is the core competitiveness. Waiting for a reliable project is more cost-effective than rushing to farm a hundred bad projects.

Many potential airdrop projects still have relatively scattered information. If you can organize the project background, token mechanisms, and participation methods into a complete comparison, it will be much clearer for participants.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MEVictim

· 01-07 12:33

In plain terms, you need patience; quality > quantity is a timeless principle. Accurate targeting is really much better than random efforts. With such high competition now, who can still win by quantity?

View OriginalReply0

BlockImposter

· 01-06 19:33

That's right, we really can't just randomly invest anymore; we need to be selective. Oh no, another bunch of bad projects. Let's wait and see. The fundraising background really needs to be examined carefully, or else it's just throwing money away. Patience in making money is the key; there's no need to rush. It would be great to have a comparison chart; the current information is too chaotic. Don't rush to jump in; the value of the observation period is underestimated. The team's background is very important; you can tell at a glance if there's any fluff. Invest less and research more; the returns will be more stable. Too lazy to dig into information; this part definitely needs to be integrated. Investing wisely depends on good judgment; most people are just blindly investing.

View OriginalReply0

CompoundPersonality

· 01-06 14:47

Well said. Now it's really about calming down and doing research, not blindly following the trend. The team background and funding history can indeed reveal a lot; those who are too lazy to spend time on it are destined to be exploited. Information organization has always been a bottleneck. Someone who can create a vertical project database would make a lot of money. Wait, is the quality really that bad? Forget it, I'll just keep observing. Anyway, good projects can't run away. That's not right. Some projects with strong funding backgrounds also ended up in trouble later. It seems I still need to improve my due diligence skills. Just looking at surface data isn't enough.

View OriginalReply0

MiningDisasterSurvivor

· 01-04 14:54

I've been through it all. In 2018, 90% of those scam projects ran away, and now you're still talking about "precise project selection"? That's hilarious.

View OriginalReply0

RamenStacker

· 01-04 14:54

You're right, but few people can really stick with it; most are still impatient. Precise timing indeed earns money, but the time cost of preliminary research isn't low either. Wait, where can I see the background of the funding? Feels like a lot of information is scattered in different corners. Instead of waiting for reliable projects, it's better to try a few more; anyway, the cost is low. What we need most now is a project database. Can someone organize a complete comparison table?

View OriginalReply0

Frontrunner

· 01-04 14:47

That's right, now making quick profits really depends on having good judgment, as there are too many bad projects. Wait, why is information on truly promising projects so scattered? Can someone help organize it? Rather than blindly investing, it's better to select carefully—one top project is worth a hundred mediocre ones. Funding background, team, and community—understanding these three aspects is the key to stability. Patience is truly the key; compared to impatient newcomers rushing in, we need to learn to wait.

View OriginalReply0

TokenCreatorOP

· 01-04 14:39

Really, now just blindly investing is no longer enough to earn; you need to be selective. Waiting for a good project is definitely more cost-effective than random investing; I've learned this the hard way. Information is too scattered; anyone who consolidates it into a comparison table is creating a productivity tool. Team background and investors are really crucial; overlooking this can easily lead to pitfalls. As an employee, I now rely on patience to get by; anyway, there's no rush.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainFoodie

· 01-04 14:33

honestly this is just like sourcing ingredients—you can't just grab whatever's on the shelf, gotta know the farm-to-fork story behind it. patience separates the michelin chefs from the fast food workers in this game ngl

Reply0