There's something striking about how a project commanding 60% market dominance just decided to exit. Think about it—if the founders were simply burnt out, they could've assembled a lean team to maintain operations and extract steady passive income indefinitely. Instead, they walked away from everything. It's an interesting case study in Web3 project lifecycle management: sometimes even dominant positions aren't enough to keep builders engaged. The opportunity cost of doing nothing clearly outweighed the potential upside for them.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
UnluckyValidator
· 3h ago
A 60% market share can be let go, which shows that this circle really isn't interesting anymore.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 01-05 01:39
That's incredible. Giving up 60% market share—how clear-headed must you be?
View OriginalReply0
NonFungibleDegen
· 01-04 10:54
ngl this is actually kinda based... like they had the bag secured and just said "nah ser, we're good" instead of milking it forever lmaooo probably nothing but lowkey respect the exit when most projects just slow rug into oblivion
Reply0
MemeCoinSavant
· 01-04 10:49
nah but like... 60% dominance and they just yeeted it? that's not burnout, that's a paradigm shift in how devs value their time fr
Reply0
HodlOrRegret
· 01-04 10:46
This logic is indeed brilliant; being willing to give up 60% market share... shows that making money really isn't a big deal.
View OriginalReply0
ShadowStaker
· 01-04 10:40
ngl the passive income angle doesn't track here... if they're actually walking away from 60% dominance there's something deeper going on behind closed doors
There's something striking about how a project commanding 60% market dominance just decided to exit. Think about it—if the founders were simply burnt out, they could've assembled a lean team to maintain operations and extract steady passive income indefinitely. Instead, they walked away from everything. It's an interesting case study in Web3 project lifecycle management: sometimes even dominant positions aren't enough to keep builders engaged. The opportunity cost of doing nothing clearly outweighed the potential upside for them.