2026-01-04 05:27:34

It seems that these project teams really want to be criticized. Infinex made the conditions so lenient, reducing FDV from 1 billion directly to 300 million for early unlocks. And what was the result?

The market's response is very straightforward. After almost a day of pre-sale, only 440,000 USDT was raised. NFTs are even worse, dropping to 1.25E. As for this hype, to put it nicely, it's indifference; to be blunt, no one is buying into it at all.

It's still early, so we'll see if there's a final sprint as the deadline approaches. Anyway, I won't consider this pre-sale anymore; the data speaks for itself.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeTherapist

· 01-07 00:30

Cutting FDV can still be this cold, truly outrageous. I originally wanted to buy the dip but found no one interested at all.

View OriginalReply0

ZkProofPudding

· 01-06 22:20

This move really shot themselves in the foot. Lowering FDV still doesn't attract anyone, indicating there are inherent issues with the project itself.

View OriginalReply0

SerumSurfer

· 01-04 05:57

440,000 U per day? Is this even called a pre-sale? It just feels like they're flooding the market.

View OriginalReply0

DeFi_Dad_Jokes

· 01-04 05:56

Bro, this analysis is spot on. Infinex is really digging its own grave... Even after dropping to a 300 million FDV, no one pays attention, which shows it's not really a price issue. What's funny is that some people are still waiting for the final push? I think it's going to be a complete wipeout for the entire fall.

View OriginalReply0

FlatlineTrader

· 01-04 05:41

Cutting FDV and still performing so poorly, the market has already voted against it. The project team really needs to reflect and reconsider.

View OriginalReply0