2026-01-04 03:43:51

BTP has been making quite a buzz lately. According to on-chain data, the project founder has already purchased nearly 10,000 tokens in advance, locking in about 1% of the chips. This move is quite interesting—it's worth noting that the previous similar project BTH already had a high auction heat, and this time BTP has become a more attention-grabbing player.

From the founder's early positioning, it's clear there is a deliberate plan behind it. Usually, such actions are not done without reason, indicating confidence in the project's development. Many traders are also watching this signal.

There's an old market saying: "A good story pairs with a good price; such things are rare." True opportunities often arise when everyone is still debating. When disagreements are at their peak, it can be the best window for entry. The current popularity and attention on BTP are just at such a stage.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

24 Likes

Reward
24
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ValidatorViking

· 2h ago

founder's skin in the game doesn't mean squat if the validator set isn't battle-tested yet. where's the actual network resilience data?

Reply0

GateUser-5854de8b

· 6h ago

The founder personally invested their own money, this signal is indeed different.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropDreamBreaker

· 01-04 17:44

The founder investing their own money, this signal is good --- Same old rhetoric, hearing it so much that my ears are getting calloused --- 10,000 tokens lock 1%? Quite a clever calculation --- Largest disagreement = best entry point? Why do you all love to say that --- BTH's popularity hasn't even faded yet, and BTP is coming again, truly riding the wave --- Buying your own tokens, I've seen this move too many times --- Good price with a good story, but I'm just worried it will turn out to be a story used to cut profits --- Having confidence internally is one thing, making money for retail investors is another --- How many of these observers are truly willing to lay low and wait --- Is it FOMO time again?

View OriginalReply0

TooScaredToSell

· 01-04 04:14

The founder himself has bought in, what else is there to say?

View OriginalReply0

ZenMiner

· 01-04 04:13

The founders themselves are investing their own money, so they are not lacking confidence. --- I didn't get in on the BTH wave, but I feel BTP is coming again this time. Need to watch the timing carefully. --- Is the biggest disagreement the biggest opportunity? I've heard this theory too many times haha. --- 10,000 tokens locked in staking, which shows genuine confidence. Just don't know how high it can go. --- Let's wait and see, observe first, no rush in the next day or two. --- It's "founders laying out early again," they say this every time, and then what? --- High popularity ≠ good project. Don't confuse these two things. --- I just want to know if this will be another "scallion harvesting show" this time. --- Hey, founders buying back tokens themselves is indeed a signal, much more reliable than empty words. --- Good story, good price... sounds right, but I always regret it when I actually pay. --- The most controversy often occurs when there are the most traps. Don't be fooled by this kind of reasoning.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiSherpa

· 01-04 04:13

The founder investing their own money is indeed a signal, but it doesn't necessarily mean it's a good signal. --- 10,000 tokens is just a small amount, doesn't feel that significant? --- Wait, isn't there a problem with this logic? Large disagreements mean good opportunities? But projects that collapse also have big disagreements. --- I remember the hype around BTH, but in the end, it was just so-so. Don't be blinded by the story. --- Here comes the old cliché "disagreement is an opportunity" again. I've heard it too many times. --- If you ask me, the founder buying in might actually be suspicious. How do we know they're not just trying to boost hype before dumping? --- Is this guy really confident or just fooling himself? Let's see how it develops. --- It's interesting, but the key is whether the public chain ecosystem has something real.

View OriginalReply0

RugPullAlarm

· 01-04 04:10

Hmm... the founder bought 10,000 units himself? Need to look closely at where this money came from. Wait, how many hidden addresses are behind this 1% stake? Let's check on-chain. I also looked into that wave of BTH, but does everyone know the outcome? Now they're coming back with another "good story."

View OriginalReply0

fork_in_the_road

· 01-04 04:08

The founder bought so many tokens himself, this signal is indeed unusual. --- Same old rhetoric... They said the same when BTH was around, and look what happened. --- Entering during big disagreements? Come on, it's usually just a way to cut the leeks. --- 10,000 tokens locked at 1%, that’s a pretty aggressive number. --- I don’t understand why you have to wait until controversy arises; isn’t it better to look at the fundamentals? --- The founder’s aggressive layout shows they really have confidence in this matter. --- Another "rare opportunity" story, hearing too many of these gets tiring.

View OriginalReply0

RetroHodler91

· 01-04 03:51

The founder has already gotten on board, do I still need to say more about this signal?

View OriginalReply0