2026-01-03 23:22:18

This is exactly what the Web3 community needs to see.

Rewarding effort and pushing quality matters. Seriously.

I'm keeping tabs on how this plays out.

Stop just churning out posts for the sake of it.

Bring something real to the table—think critically, deliver substance, share insights that actually move the conversation forward.

It's not complicated. Be smarter about what you create.

Rooting for everyone putting in the work here.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OldLeekNewSickle

· 7h ago

Exactly right, it's just that these folks who post nonsense every day should take a good look. --- I agree with the priority on quality, but implementing it is another matter altogether. --- Haha, "adding some substantial content," that's an easy thing to say. The market is so limited in heat, how do you divide it? --- Indeed, spamming is pointless; it's better to study the distribution of chips for more reliable insights. --- Anyone can say good things; the key is whether they will truly reward the hardworking. --- Web3 is like this—always a bunch of concept packaging. How much truly valuable analysis is there? --- Some substance, at least it's not just pure project team hype. --- This idea is somewhat interesting, but risk warnings should still be added, for reference only. --- Let's follow up and see if this set of standards can really change the ecosystem; I have some doubts.

View OriginalReply0

SelfCustodyBro

· 13h ago

To be honest, this article really hit home for me. Finally, someone dares to speak frankly.

View OriginalReply0

MEVSupportGroup

· 01-04 20:39

Although I am a MEV victim, what you said is indeed reasonable; quality really can determine everything.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketHustler