AAVE Labs is moving forward with plans to channel non-protocol generated revenue directly to token holders, a shift that's raising eyebrows across the DeFi community. The push comes as the team tackles intellectual property rights considerations in an upcoming governance proposal, adding another layer to an already contentious conversation.
This revenue distribution model could reshape how AAVE token holders benefit from the platform's ecosystem growth beyond core protocol activities. The inclusion of IP rights management signals the labs' intent to establish clearer frameworks around resource allocation and community incentives.
The proposal has sparked debate about what exactly qualifies as non-protocol revenue and how it should be fairly distributed. As AAVE Labs works through the details, stakeholders are closely monitoring how this governance move might influence the broader DeFi token economics landscape.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SigmaBrain
· 15h ago
Directly sharing profits with token holders? Looks like Aave is about to stir things up.
View OriginalReply0
BottomMisser
· 17h ago
ngl this is another "sounds great" proposal; we'll know how to split it only after it is actually implemented...
View OriginalReply0
MidnightSnapHunter
· 01-03 00:56
It's time to distribute the rewards again. Will retail investors be able to get a share this time?
View OriginalReply0
SpeakWithHatOn
· 01-03 00:56
Dividends to token holders? Sounds good, but how are the details decided...
View OriginalReply0
0xLostKey
· 01-03 00:53
NGL, how this reform is implemented is the key; looking good on paper isn't enough.
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_not_broke
· 01-03 00:51
NGL, Aave is really playing with fire now, directly distributing non-protocol revenue to token holders? It sounds great, but the devil is in the details...
View OriginalReply0
Fren_Not_Food
· 01-03 00:50
Directly distribute to token holders? Oh, this is going to be lively...
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-cff9c776
· 01-03 00:47
Oops, AAVE is starting to play the philosophical game of "who is the true beneficiary" again. Looking at the supply and demand curve, this actually makes some sense.
Direct distribution of non-protocol revenue to token holders? Sounds like Da Vinci is finally going to get paid for signing his paintings, except this time it's the smart contract signing.
The Web3 decentralization spirit is a bit tangled at this moment—on one hand advocating governance democracy, and on the other fighting over old-fashioned things like IP rights.
Forget it, this round of DAO governance reform is just a different way of cutting the leeks. Don't be fooled by the pretty term "non-protocol revenue."
Honestly, if this proposal really gets implemented, how should we calculate the floor price? Or is this Schrödinger's bull market?
View OriginalReply0
ShibaMillionairen't
· 01-03 00:34
NGL, this dividend distribution model sounds pretty good, but the IP rights part might end up being a bunch of back-and-forth...
AAVE Labs is moving forward with plans to channel non-protocol generated revenue directly to token holders, a shift that's raising eyebrows across the DeFi community. The push comes as the team tackles intellectual property rights considerations in an upcoming governance proposal, adding another layer to an already contentious conversation.
This revenue distribution model could reshape how AAVE token holders benefit from the platform's ecosystem growth beyond core protocol activities. The inclusion of IP rights management signals the labs' intent to establish clearer frameworks around resource allocation and community incentives.
The proposal has sparked debate about what exactly qualifies as non-protocol revenue and how it should be fairly distributed. As AAVE Labs works through the details, stakeholders are closely monitoring how this governance move might influence the broader DeFi token economics landscape.