#2026年美国股市展望 A well-known analyst Samson Mow's recent prediction has sparked quite a bit of discussion. Interestingly, he first mentioned that 2025 might face adjustment pressures, but then quickly shifted to suggest that Bitcoin could enter a ten-year upward cycle, targeting 2035. This "initial dip followed by a surge" narrative can indeed be quite perplexing.
$BTC, $ZEC, $ZEN, and other mainstream cryptocurrencies are all undergoing tests of market cycles. From a technical perspective, such long-term forecasts are often based on historical data and macroeconomic analysis. Whether or not the predictions come true ultimately reflects the market's re-pricing of the long-term value of crypto assets.
For investors, the most practical question is: how should one respond to potential short-term volatility? Some choose to accumulate during corrections, while others prefer to wait and see. Both strategies have their merits. The key is to have a clear understanding of your own risk tolerance.
A ten-year commitment sounds very appealing, but the market is never short of stories. What truly tests investors are those cold, hard numbers—position management, stop-loss settings, and psychological resilience. In cyclical markets, those who survive and profit are often not the most ambitious dreamers, but the most disciplined executors.
What do you think about this prediction? Are you preparing your ammunition in advance, or observing and waiting?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
VCsSuckMyLiquidity
· 2025-12-31 22:01
A ten-year upward cycle? It sounds like a story, but actually making money still depends on stop-loss and mindset.
View OriginalReply0
GreenCandleCollector
· 2025-12-31 00:01
A ten-year story sounds sexy, but I still believe in position management more.
View OriginalReply0
SigmaBrain
· 2025-12-29 09:48
A ten-year long cycle? Sounds great, but I trust DCA and stop-loss strategies, which are boring but effective.
View OriginalReply0
GasGuzzler
· 2025-12-28 23:58
Ten-year commitment? Just listen, but in the end, it's really about who survives until the last.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMigrant
· 2025-12-28 23:55
A ten-year cycle sounds very appealing, but to be honest, I still think Samson's "initial suppression followed by rise" approach sounds a bit too smooth... The transition feels a bit abrupt.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a606bf0c
· 2025-12-28 23:54
A ten-year cycle sounds great, but how many people will actually live until 2035? The key is still how to get through now.
View OriginalReply0
DYORMaster
· 2025-12-28 23:50
A ten-year long cycle sounds wonderful, but how many actually live to see that day?
View OriginalReply0
ForkTongue
· 2025-12-28 23:41
Just listening to the ten-year cycle is enough; we still need to see how to get through 2025 before saying anything.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlord
· 2025-12-28 23:37
A ten-year upward cycle? Just hear it out. Let's get through 2025 first.
#2026年美国股市展望 A well-known analyst Samson Mow's recent prediction has sparked quite a bit of discussion. Interestingly, he first mentioned that 2025 might face adjustment pressures, but then quickly shifted to suggest that Bitcoin could enter a ten-year upward cycle, targeting 2035. This "initial dip followed by a surge" narrative can indeed be quite perplexing.
$BTC, $ZEC, $ZEN, and other mainstream cryptocurrencies are all undergoing tests of market cycles. From a technical perspective, such long-term forecasts are often based on historical data and macroeconomic analysis. Whether or not the predictions come true ultimately reflects the market's re-pricing of the long-term value of crypto assets.
For investors, the most practical question is: how should one respond to potential short-term volatility? Some choose to accumulate during corrections, while others prefer to wait and see. Both strategies have their merits. The key is to have a clear understanding of your own risk tolerance.
A ten-year commitment sounds very appealing, but the market is never short of stories. What truly tests investors are those cold, hard numbers—position management, stop-loss settings, and psychological resilience. In cyclical markets, those who survive and profit are often not the most ambitious dreamers, but the most disciplined executors.
What do you think about this prediction? Are you preparing your ammunition in advance, or observing and waiting?