What if a TGE could actually hold its ground? Picture this: quickflippers dump their bags, degens go all-in then bail, jeeters do their usual thing—yet the price barely budges. Sounds wild, right? But there's a reason people are eyeing the TVS and IWO models. These mechanisms are reshaping how we think about post-launch tokenomics. The real play isn't stopping people from selling; it's architecting markets that don't collapse when they do.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PhantomHunter
· 11h ago
Hmm... Can TVS really hold up? Seems like it's more about the team's execution capability.
View OriginalReply0
PumpBeforeRug
· 11h ago
Really? The TVS system has indeed changed the approach; it's no longer about forcibly locking liquidity.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketNoodler
· 11h ago
Price stability depends not on locking assets, but on proper liquidity design—that's the real key.
View OriginalReply0
OfflineNewbie
· 11h ago
Really? Can TVS and IWO block the dump? I still think it's all nonsense.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichTrader
· 11h ago
Haha, the gameplay of TVS and IWO is indeed interesting. It's much better than simply locking up assets in a straightforward manner.
What if a TGE could actually hold its ground? Picture this: quickflippers dump their bags, degens go all-in then bail, jeeters do their usual thing—yet the price barely budges. Sounds wild, right? But there's a reason people are eyeing the TVS and IWO models. These mechanisms are reshaping how we think about post-launch tokenomics. The real play isn't stopping people from selling; it's architecting markets that don't collapse when they do.