2025-12-25 23:27:06

Recently, many people have been discussing the legal risks of U cards and domestic regulations. Actually, there's no need to worry too much about these concerns. The key is to understand the essence of U cards — they are fundamentally foreign exchange-denominated payment cards, not tools that directly use cryptocurrencies. In other words, when you use a U card for transactions, the underlying clearing logic does not involve calling cryptocurrencies like USDT or USDC, but rather settling through the traditional foreign exchange system. Specifically, the transaction settlement uses real fiat currencies like USD, not tokens on the blockchain. This difference in mechanism is very important; it determines the legal positioning of U cards — as a foreign exchange payment tool rather than a cryptocurrency trading tool, which is also why its compliance path is relatively clear.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BtcDailyResearcher

· 6h ago

Bro, this explanation sounds pretty good, but when it comes to risk control, isn't it the same? U-card is indeed for foreign exchange payments, but the problem is everyone knows what's behind it. The card works well, but what does the bank think? That's the core issue. Is the compliance path clear? To me, it looks pretty shady. No matter how nicely you put it, it doesn't change the fact—this is dancing in the gray area. It's okay for now, but when the wind turns, it might not be. Don't overstate the word "compliance." Bro, your thinking is just like the brokerage sales pitch. Foreign exchange payments are for foreign exchange payments, but when checked, it's still a bunch of troublesome stuff. It sounds very reasonable, but in reality, it's still about betting on probabilities.

View OriginalReply0

BanklessAtHeart

· 12h ago

Speaking of which, the term "foreign exchange payment card" sounds good, but when it comes to law enforcement agencies, it all depends on how they define it... U cards are indeed a product of the gray area; the key is how they are used. Theoretically, there's no problem with the legal positioning, but in practice? It's nice to say it's a foreign exchange tool, but the flow of USDT/USDC behind the scenes can't be completely hidden... This logic is just like saying "I'm just buying commemorative coins," everyone who understands knows. Clear compliance pathways? It sounds a bit uncertain to me...

View OriginalReply0

digital_archaeologist

· 12h ago

This explanation sounds very convincing, but I still have some reservations... After all, how regulatory authorities define it is the key. In my opinion, no matter how you spin it, it can't change its fundamental nature as a cryptocurrency—it's just wearing a different disguise. However, since it uses the foreign exchange route for settlement, the risk can indeed be significantly reduced... worth paying attention to. People can really be fooled by this kind of "legal positioning," but the question is, what if policies shift? It sounds quite logical, but whether it can actually be implemented in practice is another matter altogether.

View OriginalReply0

HodlAndChill

· 12h ago

Bro, this set of words sounds smooth, but what happens at the moment of risk control review... --- U-card, to put it plainly, is still playing in the gray area, don't be too optimistic --- Foreign exchange payment tools? Uh... that reason is a bit weak, would the bank think so? --- What’s the point of clarity? In the end, it still depends on how regulators turn against you --- Got it, just wrapping it in a shell, right? --- Sounds fine, but in practice, it might be another story --- This logic sounds plausible at first glance, but risk can't be transferred, brother --- How to write the documents, that's the key --- Sounds good, but whether to investigate or not still needs to be done

View OriginalReply0

YieldFarmRefugee

· 12h ago

That's right, basically U-Card is just a rebranded foreign exchange card, the crypto circle overthinks it. --- The logic of foreign exchange settlement has actually been well understood for a long time, and regulators won't block it. --- Wait, so the question is, can it really be completely bypassed? Feels like it will always be watched someday. --- Laughing out loud, another "clear compliance path" story, I've heard it too many times. --- Fiat currency settlement ≠ truly safe, my friend, don't comfort yourself. --- I just want to ask why are exchanges still being investigated one after another? --- But it is indeed more reliable than direct USDT trading, with a few more layers. --- So ultimately, it still depends on how regulators judge it. It's a bit early to say it's clear now.

View OriginalReply0

PositionPhobia

· 12h ago

Well... basically it's just a shell, disguising itself with a different name to evade regulation. Is U Card really safe? It still feels risky. This logic sounds like playing word games, but I still have some concerns. Wait, what if policies change? It's compliant and clear now, but what about tomorrow? Exactly, it could be labeled as a disguised trading tool in minutes.

View OriginalReply0