Recently, I have been paying attention to the development direction of the RWA track, and I want to say—simply putting US stock assets on the blockchain is not fundamentally the same as a true RWA application. This distinction is worth deep consideration.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RunWithRugs
· 6h ago
That's correct, it's just a shell game. True RWA should be a revolution in asset liquidity. Currently, most projects are just hyping concepts.
View OriginalReply0
MeaninglessApe
· 6h ago
Exactly right. Now, a bunch of projects are just simple packaging, creating a tokenized shell and daring to call it RWA. It's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
DegenApeSurfer
· 7h ago
That's a good point, but how many projects are truly capable of doing a good job at tokenization?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeSurvivor
· 7h ago
That's right, it's just a shell game. True RWA should generate value directly on the chain.
Recently, I have been paying attention to the development direction of the RWA track, and I want to say—simply putting US stock assets on the blockchain is not fundamentally the same as a true RWA application. This distinction is worth deep consideration.