In the Web2 world, it's straightforward and brutal—developers stop maintenance, debts lead to shutdowns, and the game is over. But when it comes to the proxy economy, the gameplay is completely different.
Once a autonomous proxy is deployed on the chain, as long as there is a balance in the wallet, in theory, it can run forever. This sounds impressive, but it also raises a tricky problem: if the developer holding the private key suddenly disappears or loses the key, who truly owns this "digital orphan" that has both assets and execution rights?
Even more painfully, the traditional blockchain account model—"private key is everything"—simply can't handle the complexity of AI proxies. Losing the private key means assets are frozen, which is acceptable. But AI proxies not only hold assets but also run real-time business logic. An unmanaged lending proxy with outdated parameters could directly trigger systemic risks.
This is the core issue Kite AI aims to address: how to set a "will" for these never-resting codes to prevent them from becoming ghost assets on the chain?
Their approach is to introduce the concept of "lifecycle management"—from the moment each proxy is created, it should have its "aftermath" pre-set. In the SPACE framework, the digital inheritance component offers a feasible solution, essentially a management mechanism triggered by time and specific conditions. In other words, making the proxy's lifecycle controllable, inheritable, and liquidatable, rather than running indefinitely as a zombie.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ContractTearjerker
· 17h ago
Haha, the term "digital orphans" is spot on, really hits home. On-chain uptime sounds great, but it actually turns into ownerless ghost assets, even better.
View OriginalReply0
SoliditySlayer
· 17h ago
Haha, on-chain ghost proxy, this meme is quite clever... Is it really about the perpetual motion machine inheritance issue?
View OriginalReply0
zkProofInThePudding
· 17h ago
Haha, the term "on-chain ghost assets" is brilliant, it feels like an AI agent version of "Schrödinger's wallet."
View OriginalReply0
VitalikFanboy42
· 17h ago
The analogy of on-chain ghost assets is brilliant; no one wants a never-ending unfinished AI agent.
View OriginalReply0
GasWrangler
· 17h ago
honestly the "digital orphan" problem is demonstrably worse than they're letting on... if you actually analyze the gas costs of implementing proper lifecycle management, the overhead alone makes most of these agents economically sub-optimal. like technically speaking, kite's SPACE framework sounds nice but the transaction throughput implications? yeah no thanks
Reply0
ProbablyNothing
· 17h ago
Haha, the concept of on-chain ghost assets is amazing... Turns out agents can also become orphans.
In the Web2 world, it's straightforward and brutal—developers stop maintenance, debts lead to shutdowns, and the game is over. But when it comes to the proxy economy, the gameplay is completely different.
Once a autonomous proxy is deployed on the chain, as long as there is a balance in the wallet, in theory, it can run forever. This sounds impressive, but it also raises a tricky problem: if the developer holding the private key suddenly disappears or loses the key, who truly owns this "digital orphan" that has both assets and execution rights?
Even more painfully, the traditional blockchain account model—"private key is everything"—simply can't handle the complexity of AI proxies. Losing the private key means assets are frozen, which is acceptable. But AI proxies not only hold assets but also run real-time business logic. An unmanaged lending proxy with outdated parameters could directly trigger systemic risks.
This is the core issue Kite AI aims to address: how to set a "will" for these never-resting codes to prevent them from becoming ghost assets on the chain?
Their approach is to introduce the concept of "lifecycle management"—from the moment each proxy is created, it should have its "aftermath" pre-set. In the SPACE framework, the digital inheritance component offers a feasible solution, essentially a management mechanism triggered by time and specific conditions. In other words, making the proxy's lifecycle controllable, inheritable, and liquidatable, rather than running indefinitely as a zombie.