The hydrogen energy sector is waking up from a long slumber, and early signs suggest the next decade could reshape energy markets globally. While the initial wave of hydrogen enthusiasm in 2020 fizzled under mounting costs and infrastructure delays, the survivors in this space are now primed for extraordinary returns. With the market projected to hit $1.4 trillion annually by 2050, investors willing to look past the wreckage may find compelling entry points.
The Market Bottoming Out—A Contrarian’s Dream
The hydrogen industry has endured a brutal correction. Of all hydrogen projects announced since 2020, merely 4% remain active five years later. The hype evaporated as regulatory uncertainty, high development costs, and slower-than-expected infrastructure buildout disappointed early believers. Yet this purge has an upside: it separated serious players from fair-weather operators.
The momentum is shifting. Over 60 governments worldwide have now codified hydrogen strategies, signaling renewed policy commitment. The US among them is increasing capital allocation to hydrogen infrastructure. These tailwinds suggest the worst is behind us, and the companies that survived the downturn are positioned to capture disproportionate gains as demand finally materializes.
Plug Power: The Aggressive Bet
Plug Power stands as the riskiest but potentially most rewarding play in hydrogen. The stock has cratered 79% from its peak, reflecting the sector’s struggles. Yet the company refused to surrender. In October 2025, Plug raised $370 million from an institutional investor, with additional capacity of up to $1.4 billion if drawn down. This capital infusion extends the runway for continued technology development.
The bull thesis rests on Plug’s comprehensive strategy: vertical integration spanning electrolyzers, hydrogen production, and refueling networks. Early partnerships with Walmart and Amazon suggest real commercial traction. If hydrogen adoption accelerates as forecasted, Plug’s infrastructure could become indispensable.
The bear case is equally valid. The company burns cash rapidly and carries substantial debt obligations. Execution risk is extraordinarily high. For investors with high risk tolerance and a multi-decade horizon, Plug represents a potential breakout opportunity. For conservative portfolios, the volatility may prove unbearable.
Bloom Energy: The Differentiated Play
Bloom Energy has carved a distinct niche through solid oxide fuel cells—technology that delivers superior efficiency and fuel flexibility compared to competing approaches. Unlike Plug, Bloom has already demonstrated profitability on a non-GAAP basis and boasts legitimate revenue generation approaching $2 billion for 2025.
The company’s sweet spot is data centers. As artificial intelligence infrastructure expands globally, cooling and power demands will skyrocket. Bloom is positioned as a primary beneficiary of this trend. The technology works, revenue scales, and industrial adoption is accelerating across regions.
The caveat: Bloom’s valuation may be pricing in rosy scenarios. Market expectations for growth velocity could outpace the company’s actual execution capabilities. Bloom represents a middle-ground investment—more stable than Plug, but still carrying meaningful growth expectations baked into the price.
Linde: The Conservative Alternative
Linde presents an entirely different proposition. As a diversified industrial gas giant, hydrogen represents just one thread in its expansive fabric. The company supplies hydrogen to refineries and chemical plants, leveraging decades of expertise in industrial gases. Recently, Linde initiated green hydrogen projects across the US and Europe.
For investors seeking exposure to hydrogen without the volatility inherent in pure-play hydrogen firms, Linde offers safety. The company delivers consistent financial performance, including annual dividends of $6 per share, and maintains a business model resilient across economic cycles. Hydrogen becomes an additional growth vector rather than an existential bet.
The tradeoff is clear: minimal downside accompanied by modest upside. Linde won’t produce the explosive returns potential hydrogen winners could generate, but it provides legitimate participation without binary risk.
The Industry’s Remaining Hurdles
The hydrogen sector still faces substantial headwinds. The vast majority of hydrogen produced today remains “dirty,” generated through processes that emit significant carbon. Clean, or “green,” hydrogen accounted for just 0.1% of total production in 2023—a telling figure about current market maturity.
Commercial viability and cost-effectiveness remain unproven at scale. Transitioning global hydrogen production from carbon-intensive methods to clean processes requires capital deployment on an immense scale and technological breakthroughs yet to materialize. Policy implementation also remains inconsistent; while 60-plus governments have hydrogen strategies, deployment speeds and funding levels vary dramatically.
These obstacles will require time and unprecedented capital commitment to overcome. Patient investors should view this as a feature rather than a bug—it means valuations may remain depressed longer, creating more attractive entry points.
Constructing a Hydrogen Position
Plug Power, Bloom Energy, and Linde collectively offer a spectrum of hydrogen exposure. Risk-averse investors should lean toward Linde, accepting steady returns for downside protection. Growth-oriented investors may split allocations between Bloom for differentiated technology and Bloom for operational viability. Only the most aggressive speculators should concentrate heavily in Plug.
Current valuations across the hydrogen space remain compelling relative to long-term potential. The multi-year downturn has created pricing opportunities unlikely to persist once the sector’s narrative shifts. The window to position ahead of broader recognition may be narrowing.
The hydrogen boom has merely been delayed, not canceled. Companies that endured the downturn are the ones to watch.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Three Hydrogen Powerhouses Positioned to Dominate the Clean Energy Boom
The hydrogen energy sector is waking up from a long slumber, and early signs suggest the next decade could reshape energy markets globally. While the initial wave of hydrogen enthusiasm in 2020 fizzled under mounting costs and infrastructure delays, the survivors in this space are now primed for extraordinary returns. With the market projected to hit $1.4 trillion annually by 2050, investors willing to look past the wreckage may find compelling entry points.
The Market Bottoming Out—A Contrarian’s Dream
The hydrogen industry has endured a brutal correction. Of all hydrogen projects announced since 2020, merely 4% remain active five years later. The hype evaporated as regulatory uncertainty, high development costs, and slower-than-expected infrastructure buildout disappointed early believers. Yet this purge has an upside: it separated serious players from fair-weather operators.
The momentum is shifting. Over 60 governments worldwide have now codified hydrogen strategies, signaling renewed policy commitment. The US among them is increasing capital allocation to hydrogen infrastructure. These tailwinds suggest the worst is behind us, and the companies that survived the downturn are positioned to capture disproportionate gains as demand finally materializes.
Plug Power: The Aggressive Bet
Plug Power stands as the riskiest but potentially most rewarding play in hydrogen. The stock has cratered 79% from its peak, reflecting the sector’s struggles. Yet the company refused to surrender. In October 2025, Plug raised $370 million from an institutional investor, with additional capacity of up to $1.4 billion if drawn down. This capital infusion extends the runway for continued technology development.
The bull thesis rests on Plug’s comprehensive strategy: vertical integration spanning electrolyzers, hydrogen production, and refueling networks. Early partnerships with Walmart and Amazon suggest real commercial traction. If hydrogen adoption accelerates as forecasted, Plug’s infrastructure could become indispensable.
The bear case is equally valid. The company burns cash rapidly and carries substantial debt obligations. Execution risk is extraordinarily high. For investors with high risk tolerance and a multi-decade horizon, Plug represents a potential breakout opportunity. For conservative portfolios, the volatility may prove unbearable.
Bloom Energy: The Differentiated Play
Bloom Energy has carved a distinct niche through solid oxide fuel cells—technology that delivers superior efficiency and fuel flexibility compared to competing approaches. Unlike Plug, Bloom has already demonstrated profitability on a non-GAAP basis and boasts legitimate revenue generation approaching $2 billion for 2025.
The company’s sweet spot is data centers. As artificial intelligence infrastructure expands globally, cooling and power demands will skyrocket. Bloom is positioned as a primary beneficiary of this trend. The technology works, revenue scales, and industrial adoption is accelerating across regions.
The caveat: Bloom’s valuation may be pricing in rosy scenarios. Market expectations for growth velocity could outpace the company’s actual execution capabilities. Bloom represents a middle-ground investment—more stable than Plug, but still carrying meaningful growth expectations baked into the price.
Linde: The Conservative Alternative
Linde presents an entirely different proposition. As a diversified industrial gas giant, hydrogen represents just one thread in its expansive fabric. The company supplies hydrogen to refineries and chemical plants, leveraging decades of expertise in industrial gases. Recently, Linde initiated green hydrogen projects across the US and Europe.
For investors seeking exposure to hydrogen without the volatility inherent in pure-play hydrogen firms, Linde offers safety. The company delivers consistent financial performance, including annual dividends of $6 per share, and maintains a business model resilient across economic cycles. Hydrogen becomes an additional growth vector rather than an existential bet.
The tradeoff is clear: minimal downside accompanied by modest upside. Linde won’t produce the explosive returns potential hydrogen winners could generate, but it provides legitimate participation without binary risk.
The Industry’s Remaining Hurdles
The hydrogen sector still faces substantial headwinds. The vast majority of hydrogen produced today remains “dirty,” generated through processes that emit significant carbon. Clean, or “green,” hydrogen accounted for just 0.1% of total production in 2023—a telling figure about current market maturity.
Commercial viability and cost-effectiveness remain unproven at scale. Transitioning global hydrogen production from carbon-intensive methods to clean processes requires capital deployment on an immense scale and technological breakthroughs yet to materialize. Policy implementation also remains inconsistent; while 60-plus governments have hydrogen strategies, deployment speeds and funding levels vary dramatically.
These obstacles will require time and unprecedented capital commitment to overcome. Patient investors should view this as a feature rather than a bug—it means valuations may remain depressed longer, creating more attractive entry points.
Constructing a Hydrogen Position
Plug Power, Bloom Energy, and Linde collectively offer a spectrum of hydrogen exposure. Risk-averse investors should lean toward Linde, accepting steady returns for downside protection. Growth-oriented investors may split allocations between Bloom for differentiated technology and Bloom for operational viability. Only the most aggressive speculators should concentrate heavily in Plug.
Current valuations across the hydrogen space remain compelling relative to long-term potential. The multi-year downturn has created pricing opportunities unlikely to persist once the sector’s narrative shifts. The window to position ahead of broader recognition may be narrowing.
The hydrogen boom has merely been delayed, not canceled. Companies that endured the downturn are the ones to watch.