Every once in a while, someone launches a project that claims "all fees are used to purchase DEXscreener popularity." It sounds novel, but in reality, it's just the same old thing in a different guise. The result? These kinds of projects are still crazily pursued, with prices soaring. The question is, why can this model repeatedly harvest? Knowing full well that this is just a repetition of past mistakes—pretty words, false promises of mechanisms, and ultimately chaos. Yet participants keep rushing in. What is the driving force behind this phenomenon? Is it information asymmetry, or just a desire to take a gamble? In this ecosystem, similar tricks have been played so many times, why do people continue to repeat these games?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Every once in a while, someone launches a project that claims "all fees are used to purchase DEXscreener popularity." It sounds novel, but in reality, it's just the same old thing in a different guise. The result? These kinds of projects are still crazily pursued, with prices soaring. The question is, why can this model repeatedly harvest? Knowing full well that this is just a repetition of past mistakes—pretty words, false promises of mechanisms, and ultimately chaos. Yet participants keep rushing in. What is the driving force behind this phenomenon? Is it information asymmetry, or just a desire to take a gamble? In this ecosystem, similar tricks have been played so many times, why do people continue to repeat these games?